Haha...I just think it's kinda funny to publicly announce that you're going to privately message someone! :nod: But I'm sure that Miss Ruby appreciates all the support!Hi there,
Sent u a pm![]()
Haha...I just think it's kinda funny to publicly announce that you're going to privately message someone! :nod: But I'm sure that Miss Ruby appreciates all the support!Hi there,
Sent u a pm![]()
Lol, I know but as she is new she may not sign in or have notifications as to messages. Sometimes I don't sign in and never look in my inbox.Haha...I just think it's kinda funny to publicly announce that you're going to privately message someone! :nod: But I'm sure that Miss Ruby appreciates all the support!
Yeah, I knew that!Lol, I know but as she is new she may not sign in or have notifications as to messages. Sometimes I don't sign in and never look in my inbox.
Yup, you definitely bring a valid point that I haven't touched too much on in this thread because my focus in this thread was the topic of his visiting SPs. I would not go to PERB to discuss my parenting and my self-growth, though I'm sure it could be an appropriate avenue for some people. In any case, what you've said does make sense and I know -it is a very large focus in my life. I do work on this and have been for a long time. Thanks.But be happy with you is number one to being a successful mom and parent. Do you get what I am saying?
Hatrick, not many women I know would deal with their husbands pooning well.
Hatricks post's from when he joined here about the same time as me are legendary, he always made me laughI don't exactly think that "pooning well" has been the origin of Hatrick's relative fame around here.
Originally Posted by cuteangie
Hatrick, not many women I know would deal with their husbands pooning well.Miss CA must have lightening fingers, and they sometimes get away from her. I think what she meant was, "not many women I know would deal well, with their husband's pooning."I don't exactly think that "pooning well" has been the origin of Hatrick's relative fame around here.
And yes, Hatrick's posts are legendary!
You are confused. Either that or you have comprehension issues. I have never blamed anyone for being raped, and have never excused the rapists.Tug, finally! Phew! You should have used this right-thinking logic in the What Evil Anti-Sex Society is Killing These Girls thread! You had a brain-warp in that one blaming the rape victims for their tragedy and said that the rapists were not entirely at fault.
Logic confusion can strike us at the worst of times, but I'm glad for you because there can be redemption for hypocrites too.
No starry eyes. I have no illusions about how hard it is, but, marriage is a partnership, and if you are committed to that then you would abide by the rules of that partnership.Wow wow wow...you must be practically the only guy that thinks like this. Or you're a single guy, with starry-eyed notions of someday meeting the perfect, wonderful, soul-mate of a gorgeous woman, whom you'll marry and live happily ever after with.
Do I sound jaded? :nod:
Do you wanna get married?![]()
I understand the distinction you're talking about but trust me... most people don't. You'll never stop getting pilloried for it. And here's why.. it begs the question... maybe we should be able to walk down a dark alley at night. Maybe it's outrageous to live in a society where you can't walk down a dark alley at night. Maybe instead of accepting that it's dangerous and always will be we need to change the situation. Maybe that's not realistic but you have to look at the analogy with sex assault and see that's where it breaks down for many and that it comes across as blaming the victim. It implies that the onus is on women to moderate their behaviour in order to accommodate the wild and anti-social urges of some fucked up men.You are confused. Either that or you have comprehension issues. I have never blamed anyone for being raped, and have never excused the rapists.
What I have said is that everyone has the responsibility to avoid placing themselves in danger, and when they choose to ignore that and end up getting hurt, the responsibility for ignoring is theirs and theirs alone. That is completely distinct from what actually happened to them. Those are two completely separate things, but you choose to merge them into one because you dont want to address the more difficult issue of what we can do ourselves to ensure our safety. There are actions the victim takes leading up to an attack, and they are responsible for THOSE actions (unless you somehow think the rapist is engaging in mind control and making them do those things). The rapist is responsible for his/her actions.
You walk down a dark alley in the middle of the night and get mugged. You are responsible for being stupid and walking down a dark alley in the middle of the night where you stand a good chance of being attacked. The Mugger is responsible for mugging you. Two completely different things. Those girls are not being blamed for being raped, they are being blamed for placing themselves in a situation where they are highly vulnerable to rape. Society is not sympathetic to people who do stupid things in general. That doesn't mean they are defending rape. Most people appear to be too dim-witted to comprehend that distinction.
The real debate that arises from this is what should and shouldn't be considered wild, anti-social urges of some fucked up men. What is wild and anti-social and how do we categorize fucked up?It implies that the onus is on women to moderate their behaviour in order to accommodate the wild and anti-social urges of some fucked up men.






