Are ex-SPs potential relationship material?

tantalizeme

wolf in sheep's clothing
Oct 5, 2007
1,512
13
38
I’m pretty open about pooning, which makes for some lively discussions…like the one I recently had with an opinionated, worldly-wise woman friend. She knows I’ve developed the occasional harmless crush on a select few favorite SPs.

“Could you handle dating an escort?” she asked.

“From reading escort review websites I gather some guys can,” I said. “Personally no; it’s just too hard. But you know, I sometimes fantasize about hooking up with an intelligent and still reasonably attractive retired SP. There must be millions of them in China alone, and quite a few in Canada too. Surely most eventually want to settle down to a normal life.”

“Yes,” she said, “but they rarely tell their partners or husbands about their past as sex workers. Why in the world would you consider someone like that a promising match?”

"Of course, the usual things would have to check out—mutual attraction, shared interests, emotional warmth," I answered. "But if she's an ex-SP I guess she's had more chance to hone her skills in bed... She's more likely to be sexually adventurous, not boringly monogamous or possessive, a great companion to visit swing clubs with, for example.”

“It’s not what you think,” my friend said. “Let me tell you as a woman, former sex workers are likely to be burnt-out, washed-up human wrecks. The last thing they’re interested in is sex. They’re bound to carry dark memories and traumas they’ll project onto you. They often hate men, and the only likely reason they’d marry you is to be supported and perhaps have kids. Plus, they’ll remember lovers that are far better than you, stronger, more handsome, richer. Often they have some disease, likely at least herpes. And most won't have a good education or marketable skills, so you'll likely have to support her financially without getting intellectual stimulation or even plenty of good sex in return."

Well, this was the gist of my friend's opinion, quite an earful. I must say, my respect for the indispensable function of SPs is undiminished—but my naïve enthusiasm for considering former SPs to be promising relationship material certainly feels like a punctured balloon.:(
 

FortunateOne

Banned
Jan 29, 2008
1,693
10
0
vancouver
I think there is an added element too, considering you are usually only interested in the sps who are not Canadian citizens. They wish to return home; this is only a temporary working stop for them. It is unlikely that you will be able to meet one here, or if you meet one there, that she has any interest in returning to Vancouver -- where she used to work and is far more likely to run into someone she "knew". When she is ready to retire, it won't be here, I would guess.

As suggested, she would want to leave it behind her. This is also, no doubt a cultural thing. She can do that there. She would prefer to marry someone who is ignorant of her past, and settle down. If she married someone like you, she would do so on the understanding that she would continue to have to perform up to sp standards. Okay for making $$, maybe not so okay when raising 2 kids.

Also, some of your fantasy is based on your imagination. You are enjoying lust-filled encounters with sps you really can't talk to for the most part (language) Your interpretation of who they are, their educational level, aspirations, etc is for the most part either in your imagination, or filled with words they believe you want to hear. It is possible they have limited education and no goals beyond a having a family.

That doesn't mean that all former sps are not relationship material -- only that the ones that you prefer are less likely to enter into a relationship with you. If you start to see Canadian citizens, and enjoy more communication with them, you will no doubt see the potential is there.
 

FortunateOne

Banned
Jan 29, 2008
1,693
10
0
vancouver
I completely disagree with this remark and find it insulting. This statement in no way describes my situation, attitude or personality.

I'm speechless that somebody who is educated would think like this. Is this another SP?
No, keep in mind she wouldn't be talking about indy sps like you, or even the younger Canadian sps who use this as a means to further their education. tantalizeme tends to go to asian sps at amps etc. So they do not get to choose their customers, and by necessity (lower rates) see more clients every day. They are more likely to do more risky activities, such as bbbjs and rimming, and more likely to be here on tourist or student visas. Her comments would be based on this.
 

oppai

ilikeasianswithbigtitties
Oct 6, 2002
1,160
9
38
I completely disagree with this remark and find it insulting. This statement in no way describes my situation, attitude or personality.

I'm speechless that somebody who is educated would think like this. Is this another SP?
Why are we so quick as a nation to take offence to things not related to us. They were clearly not talking about you but while T did generalize by saying SP it obviously would not include ALL SP's.
 
Aug 16, 2006
977
10
0
Individuals

Sweeping statements like above always make me laugh.

Every SP I've met has been unique. An individual.

Some have drug problems, some HAD drug problems, some have never done drugs.

Some have kids, some don't. Some want kids, some don't.

Some are educated, some aren't. Some are going to school or will be.

Some love sex, some are burnt out sexually.

You get the point. Some SP's, retired or not would make great partners for some men. Each situation is unique.

Just my opinion, but I imagine every other SP will agree with me 100% because we're all pretty much the same, right? :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: melissa.in.abby

Inamorato

New member
Jul 6, 2007
323
3
0
Sweeping statements like above always make me laugh.

Every SP I've met has been unique. An individual.

Some have drug problems, some HAD drug problems, some have never done drugs.

Some have kids, some don't. Some want kids, some don't.

Some are educated, some aren't. Some are going to school or will be.

Some love sex, some are burnt out sexually.

You get the point. Some SP's, retired or not would make great partners for some men. Each situation is unique.

Just my opinion, but I imagine every other SP will agree with me 100% because we're all pretty much the same, right? :rolleyes:
Very well said.
I'm always amazed at how quickly people make generalizations regarding SPs, overlooking the fact that every individual has a unique set of circumstances and unique ambitions.
 

moi

Female Companion
Mar 31, 2008
620
5
0
Edmontons
I’m pretty open about pooning, which makes for some lively discussions…like the one I recently had with an opinionated, worldly-wise woman friend. She knows I’ve developed the occasional harmless crush on a select few favorite SPs.


“It’s not what you think,” my friend said. “Let me tell you as a woman, former sex workers are likely to be burnt-out, washed-up human wrecks. The last thing they’re interested in is sex. They’re bound to carry dark memories and traumas they’ll project onto you. They often hate men, and the only likely reason they’d marry you is to be supported and perhaps have kids. Plus, they’ll remember lovers that are far better than you, stronger, more handsome, richer. Often they have some disease, likely at least herpes. And most won't have a good education or marketable skills, so you'll likely have to support her financially without getting intellectual stimulation or even plenty of good sex in return."
sounds like she's not so worldly-wise with her idea of an ex-SP. It all depends on a woman. Her idea of an SP is probably that of a street worker or the stereotypical of.

I'll be completely honest, I've met girls in the industry who are completely fucked up and retarded and I can't stand talking to them. I've also met lots of girls who aren't like that.
I've had bad dates when I first started, had counselling, have good friends and support and got over it. There's many girls who have bad dates even NOT in this industry, from general assholes.
I still have an idealistic view of finding the right guy, and no, I won't tell him what I do. Not everyone tells their SO of everything in their past, and what they don't know won't hurt them. I've dated wealthy guys in this industry and I still pay my own bills. You'll find many girls are independent and don't like to depend on a man in this industry.
I hope I have a bit of brains, my results after finals will tell but I don't think your friend is very worldly if she is merely reciting stereotypical views of SPs.
 

kalel

Member
Sep 16, 2006
667
10
18
.

and no, I won't tell him what I do. Not everyone tells their SO of everything in their past, and what they don't know won't hurt them.
so you're okay being with a violent sex offender? hey, he might feel that you don't need to know his past. i know, on the one hand we're talking about a damaging past and on the other hand we're talking about a damaging past, oh wait they're both damaging just in different degrees.
 

DQ Guy

Ice cream man
May 2, 2008
1,437
10
0
The monster under your bed
This question has been said many times before..
IMO the only difference between an SP and a non-SP
is the SP is getting paid for sex...

you can find burn outs, crack whores, and low lifes in any form
of society from the working gals to the non-working gals..

and there are great ones on both sides of the fence..
why do we always connect SP's to the bad life??
Hell I'd do it if I could :rolleyes:
 

melissa.in.abby

New member
Oct 9, 2008
543
11
0
Vancouver
Sweeping statements like above always make me laugh.

Every SP I've met has been unique. An individual.

Some have drug problems, some HAD drug problems, some have never done drugs.

Some have kids, some don't. Some want kids, some don't.

Some are educated, some aren't. Some are going to school or will be.

Some love sex, some are burnt out sexually.

You get the point. Some SP's, retired or not would make great partners for some men. Each situation is unique.

Just my opinion, but I imagine every other SP will agree with me 100% because we're all pretty much the same, right? :rolleyes:
Amen, but who couldn't agree with what you wrote, it is very true!

You seem like a great gal! :)
 

CODe333

New member
Apr 14, 2008
159
0
0
Vancouver area
What DQ Guy said.

What a person does for a living, or has done for a living in the past, is just one consideration from a range of considerations to be employed when looking at a potential partner. For me a prestigious career would never outweigh a host of incompatibilities or flaws. Careers, like other aspects of life, are a means for some people to grow and for others an excuse for avoiding growth altogether. An SP exhibiting the kind of character that comes from genuine growth would be as attractive a choice for a life partner as a person from any other background. People and situations are too varied for any generalization to have much meaning here, of course. Personally, of all the things I can think of that might come between a potential partner and me, her being an SP would rank pretty low (provided she had her shit together and was a whole and interesting person). I think my primary fear if I located such a woman, and had a prayer of a forming a relationship with her, would be that she might find me too boring! I’m pretty sure that no matter what woman I encounter (SP or not) she’ll have known guys who were better at a lot of things than I am. What we’ll have, hopefully, is a living, breathing partnership that allows her to incorporate all that she is and has learned into something new and exciting she now shares with me. Besides, the occasional remedial sex lesson from the lady of the house isn’t the worst fate I can think of.
 

MaxBoner

New member
Nov 10, 2008
89
0
0
Sure, the said ex-SP must be willing to to commit to a loving relationship and the upbringing of a family.

Said SP must also have north of 500k in bank account or related instruments, 2 houses, a yacht, fuck more than a rabbit, and be in physical shape to grace the covers of Playboy. ;)
 

smackyo

pimp supreme
May 18, 2005
1,636
4
0
your mom says hi.
so you're okay being with a violent sex offender? hey, he might feel that you don't need to know his past. i know, on the one hand we're talking about a damaging past and on the other hand we're talking about a damaging past, oh wait they're both damaging just in different degrees.
not trying to start a pissing war here but i think thats a little unfair and not too accurate a comparison. i'm sure you have things in your life that you're not too proud of (not to say that moi isn't proud of her work, i have no idea how she feels) do you feel the need to tell every woman you meet everything you've done that you are not 100% proud of for the sake of honesty?

any of these sp's if they've retired and have been tested for std's and know that they don't endanger their future partner at all then i see no need why they should have to let it be common knowledge. their past career does not hurt the one they are with now. while a past sexual offender could potentially. just my opinion but i think there is a bit of difference there.
 

moi

Female Companion
Mar 31, 2008
620
5
0
Edmontons
not trying to start a pissing war here but i think thats a little unfair and not too accurate a comparison. i'm sure you have things in your life that you're not too proud of (not to say that moi isn't proud of her work, i have no idea how she feels) do you feel the need to tell every woman you meet everything you've done that you are not 100% proud of for the sake of honesty?

any of these sp's if they've retired and have been tested for std's and know that they don't endanger their future partner at all then i see no need why they should have to let it be common knowledge. their past career does not hurt the one they are with now. while a past sexual offender could potentially. just my opinion but i think there is a bit of difference there.
i'll just quote smackyo because what I would have said would have been considerably meaner.
 

mimi

New member
Oct 9, 2008
755
11
0
55
Lower Mainland
I settled down twice and I was honest before each relationship commenced. I was a great partner. Both my ex's want me back...but, it doesn't seem to work "well" when a man knows his partner was an escort.

Quite frankly, if I am going to put aside a career wherein I am making a considerable income and dedicate myself to one partner in the role of housewife (meaning: management of the household resources, and maker of great tasty things and planner of activities etc..) I expect to be supported.

When I work I have no time for a relationship. I work and think like a man.

If I am the principle wage earner of the house then when I arrive home I want: my meal cooked, my house clean and my partner well groomed and happy. I want intelligent discussion and I never want to see someone on their ass drinking coffee while I am sweating out some household repair/gardening etc...

So many times I wished I was a lesbian and had a wife. I could have really done well for myself with a partner at home attending to all the little details and allowing me to focus on bringing in the income. If I had someone like "Aunt Bea" from the "Andy Griffith Show" I would worship the ground she walked on...

Seems to me that it doesn't matter who your SO is or was, after the first flush of ecstasy wears off it is more important that you both know YOUR JOB in the relationship...cause it's work! that's what it is...and jobs are fun if you aren't working alongside a slack ass pooch screwer!

Whew! my two bits!
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts