World War III.....

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
Gotta agree..........with the article and that it's worth a read. Interesting times indeed.
 

sevenofnine

Active member
Nov 21, 2008
2,015
9
38
don't really think so

not because people don't want to kill each other, they do, in fact,

but because of technology the level of destruction would be so great,
the question would be, was it worth it, will any one survive,
can we actually be so stupid to destroy most of the planet,
and the answer is yes,
but lets not do it in my life time thankyou very much
 

76duster

New member
Apr 6, 2014
295
0
0
There will be no direct war by great powers confronting each other. It'll be at worst a proxy war with limited nukes. It'll probably take the devastation of a smaller nation - like the Ukraine or N.Korea or Japan, to stop the escalation - and that's what everyone will expect to do if war was under way.

What has happened in the last 20 years though, is when there is war causing threat of economic collapse, foreign governments rush to buy US financial instruments. That is why war is good for the United States, bad for everyone else.
 

Mellow

New member
Jun 21, 2013
28
0
1
please be realistic. Humans do not yet have the capability to destroy most of the planet.
I believe what 7of9 was referring to was an all-out nuclear war, which for all (our) intents and purposes, would destroy most multi-cellular life on the planet. Certainly though we are a long ways from a planet-buster device!
 

sevenofnine

Active member
Nov 21, 2008
2,015
9
38
we don't have enough nuclear arsenal to destroy the planet any more??/ news to me,

would you really want to live in Canada if the Russians decided to throw everything they had at the states.
I don't know I think we could fuck up the world pretty bad,


you know they are beginning to wonder why haven't they found any intelligent live out there, in the universe, they feel they should have by now.
one school of thought says, technology out raced there social skills and they destroyed themselves in some sort of nuclear Armageddon
 

twoblues

New member
Apr 25, 2006
816
2
0
North Vancouver
Another load of American parochialism. It would help if they got the history of the start of the first world war right to start. Then, of course, Russia is currently posturing because of weakness, not strength. If one must draw parallels with the Great War, Russia is much the same shape as the Austro-Hungarian empire was militarily. Its economy cannot sustain any sort of open warfare with its largest customer's (currently) for its petroleum, which generates the lion's share of their foreign trade revenue. The same is currently true of China. A war would decimate their economic growth which is the only thing that is allowing the current regime to keep the masses placated and thus retain their hold on power.

This is the modern iteration of the 1960's so called "missile gap" where, despite the USA having more missiles, the military industrial complex promulgated the myth that the American's were the weaker. Though this time America is truly a declining great power, the rising rivals are decades away from being in a position to do something overt about it.

Of course war could happen, but in the current world it is far, far less likely than it was 100 years ago.
Thank you. Very well written.
 

sevenofnine

Active member
Nov 21, 2008
2,015
9
38
a google search on the amount of nuclear warheads out there,


23 k as in thousand warheads, 95 percent in the hands of the usa and Russians.
and there are a few thousand laying around that don't fall into a group that is counted such as tactical nuclear weapons, and others held in reserve just in case.

yeah I think that is enough.

and half life is usually in the hundered or thousands of years, so im sure they will make a bang,
 

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,690
7,264
113
Westwood
It would help if they got the history of the start of the first world war right to start
How do you think it started? The article's description is consistent with most I've heard. Margaret McMillan's "The War That Ended Peace" is a good primer. Austria-Hungarian annexation, Russian opposition, Germany backs Austria-Hungary as per treaty, France and GB back Russia as per treaty, and away we go. A bit simplified but what is your version?
Russia is currently posturing because of weakness, not strength
Maybe Putin is posturing for his home audience. Russian nationalism is pretty high right now. There is lots of (questionable) longing for the good old days when "everyone respected us".
China has so much money tied up in the USA that war would hurt them as much or more than the Americans.

WW3 is already going on and we are losing badly. It is between militant Islam and everyone else.
Our short attention span media outlets have stopped reporting on the progress of ISIS. But ISIS is now not only conquering but governing large swaths of territory. As well as recruiting fighters they are trying to recruit civil engineers, utilities workers , health care workers and other civil service type people.
Woe betide Israel if ISIS continues their expansion. Battling the Gazans is easy. Battling a well trained and well equipped army like ISIS will be very difficult and I don't expect Israel to win unless there is massive American intervention.
Many ISIS fighters return to their homeland to get care for combat injuries. Some go back to fight again, others stay behind. These veterans are often very well trained and highly motivated. They have no problem dying for their cause. If they decide to commit a terrorist act they will not be deterred by prison or execution.
 

sevenofnine

Active member
Nov 21, 2008
2,015
9
38
I watched a couple of documentaries on Israel last night on netfixs \
The Gate Keepers, and Israel the Just Cause or something or other,

Not what you would think, especially The Gate Keepers, the story of the people leading intelligence agencies in Israel, interesting thoughts from people on the ground and doing the fighting, and went through it all.

I remember a thought from a peace negotiator, he said sometimes you simply have to walk away, until the people are
sick of their own blood on the ground and taking someone else's life
There can be no peace until the two sides have ended their blood lust.

One of the things from the documentaries' there is no victory until the political reality is changed on the ground.
We have won all the battles but we are loosing the war.


And from the Israelis' themselves, we have become hard and cruel like the Nazi's
It is a sad world that we live in it really is.

Andre Sakharov I can't remember what he said, but he thought the radiation fallout would eventually kill, thousands of people, simple from nuclear testing alone, for generations to come. Yes Hiroshima is ok, but Bikini atoll is not, They horrible miscalculated the effects of radiation.

I watched a documentary on Somalia a failed state, terrible horrific, just one country small country in Africa, what do you think a failed planet would be like,
yeah life would be there it is actually hard to sterilize things, so even though people have tried genocide since the beginning of time, it hasn't really come about, but the results none the less are horrific,
 

HankQuinlan

I dont re Member
Sep 7, 2002
1,744
6
0
victoria
WW3 is already going on and we are losing badly. It is between militant Islam and everyone else.
Our short attention span media outlets have stopped reporting on the progress of ISIS. But ISIS is now not only conquering but governing large swaths of territory. As well as recruiting fighters they are trying to recruit civil engineers, utilities workers , health care workers and other civil service type people.
Woe betide Israel if ISIS continues their expansion. Battling the Gazans is easy. Battling a well trained and well equipped army like ISIS will be very difficult and I don't expect Israel to win unless there is massive American intervention.
Many ISIS fighters return to their homeland to get care for combat injuries. Some go back to fight again, others stay behind. These veterans are often very well trained and highly motivated. They have no problem dying for their cause. If they decide to commit a terrorist act they will not be deterred by prison or execution.
Not even close. This is the spectre raised by right-wing media. Of course they will be a problem -- for people trying to live normal lives in the areas they are active; more refugees, more pain for all. Are they worse than the other militias and governments in the area? Probably not. What they are, however, is a convenient boogie man for the West. They are simply the latest means of distracting us from our own problems and the greed of our own overlords. Pretty much like the predictions of constant war in "1984" (and more hilariously, in Terry Gilliam's "Brazil"). Islam is plotting to take over the world! Well, they are too late. Global corporations have beat them to it, and will keep finding ways to profit from tragedy.
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,489
8
38
on yer ignore list
Forced conversions goes against the first pillar of Islam.
actually, i read that forced conversions is what the prophet mohammed did for a good part of his life - by threat of beheading :fear:
 

sevenofnine

Active member
Nov 21, 2008
2,015
9
38
keep it real,
its not my quote its what Israel's are feeling about themselves,

They have become in some ways like the enemies they have feared and fought,

sad I don't really understand war or this conflict, who is right or wrong in this between Gaza and Israel,

In some ways, who ever is right is the winner, because they will right the history books.
I think the U.S.A has a lot to answer for, installing there governments all over the world,,

I remember a documentary, where it said big business big corporations pretty much run the world. They buy politicians government's and if they can't they replace them, That is why they went to war in Iraq, Hussein couldn't be bought, or bribed, he needed to be taken out. He was bad for business.

In some ways you know what I fear, a war might happen, it will be good for the economy, so many countries are in an economic disaster or near one, war will take peoples mind of things give goverenments excuses to raise taxes or simple take what they want.

Its like the slight of hand of a magician give the people a war to take their minds of the real issues.
 

HankQuinlan

I dont re Member
Sep 7, 2002
1,744
6
0
victoria
Looking for right and wrong in wars is a mugs game. Wars are never about right and wrong. Never. That is just what they tell the people so they can send them out to kill & be killed. Wars are fought because of greed, jealousy, pride or stupidity. Canada's participation in all its wars since confederation have fallen into the last two categories.

And wars are not good for the real economy. They create a lot of government debt in the creation of goods that have no intrinsic value. the goods are manufactured to be destroyed and are generally rapidly obsolete so even have a limited storage life if unused. Eventually the debt must be paid (or at least serviced) & in so doing, that money is unavailable to provide goods and services which are of some use to society.
Governing is never about what is good for the real economy. It is about what is good for those who control the economy. War is absolutelyfriggengreat for making money for certain people.
 

CJ Tylers

Retired Sr. Member
Jan 3, 2003
1,643
1
0
46
North Vancouver
soooooo...... Russia is officially rolling troops into the Ukraine now.... at least these ones have military patches showing their actual allegiance.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts