Why do women do outcalls?
- Thread starter Markl
- Start date
I don't care if a girl has a driver, but PLEASE.
If you are visiting someone late at night in a family type residential area.
Ask your driver not to park in front of the neighbours house, with his truck engine idleing for an hour. It draws attention, seems like common sense, but its happened to me when I had a house, a couple of times.
If you are visiting someone late at night in a family type residential area.
Ask your driver not to park in front of the neighbours house, with his truck engine idleing for an hour. It draws attention, seems like common sense, but its happened to me when I had a house, a couple of times.
Outcalls legal
Ok ..If the outcalls are legal..then why be afraid of the driver? Don't understand? Who cares? If you don't want him around..tell the sp to get him to move..This is all legal..right?....or am I totally of base here?
Ok ..If the outcalls are legal..then why be afraid of the driver? Don't understand? Who cares? If you don't want him around..tell the sp to get him to move..This is all legal..right?....or am I totally of base here?
You've been dropped on your head one time too many as a child! MAybe even as an adult.
What's legal and what's socially acceptable are two different things. Do you discuss with family and friends which whore you banged and whether she did cbj vs bbbj
Drivers
Ok. Maybe I didn't make comments very clear.
I agree with most you that if the driver comes to the door or parks outside and waits..or even is out idling in the car, that this is not very discreet.
My point is that since this is a legal service, then do not feel intimidated by asking for discretion.
I understand that the sp would like the security to be available, but it doesn't have to be known to everyone what is going on.
Ok. Maybe I didn't make comments very clear.
I agree with most you that if the driver comes to the door or parks outside and waits..or even is out idling in the car, that this is not very discreet.
My point is that since this is a legal service, then do not feel intimidated by asking for discretion.
I understand that the sp would like the security to be available, but it doesn't have to be known to everyone what is going on.
Seeing a girl in an AMP is the safest situation for this type of SP and also the john. Micros are reasonably safe if there is a boss present.
The only risk is the AMP getting visited by LE, but most of the time LE already knows what's up and really do not bother things... as long as the AMP hasn't got other things going, like drugs, gang connections, fencing, etc.
As far as bawdy house charges go, the success rate is next to nil, and LE knows it.... evidenced by not a single charge arising of the 70 MP "bust" a year ago.
The only risk is the AMP getting visited by LE, but most of the time LE already knows what's up and really do not bother things... as long as the AMP hasn't got other things going, like drugs, gang connections, fencing, etc.
As far as bawdy house charges go, the success rate is next to nil, and LE knows it.... evidenced by not a single charge arising of the 70 MP "bust" a year ago.
I agree: the sp is much safer in any kind of mp, be it micro or fox den. I think guys who want outcalls really don't want to go anywhere and be publically viewed or seen by anyone other than the sp, period. It may give them an illusion of discretion, but really, having a strange female in stilettos knocking on your door at midnight doesn't. It's got to be the least discrete or anonymous method: provide your home address, phone number and name and she shows up. There are very few pooning situations where you must provide all of this kind of information.
Outcalls can be very safe
I've often thought outcalls were safer than incall. If visiting the gentleman at his residence or hotel, I will have at the very least his full name. If something happens in a hotel, screams will be heard - and the hotel staff knows exactly who is in that room.
I know there was an incident a couple months back where one of the Calgary escorts was murdered at a residence she went to. Acutally it may have been one of the Edmonton escorts - I can't recall the city. It was tragic. However, I think it was more the exception than the rule.
If you are planning on hurting someone, you really don't want to do it in a place that is associated with you - especially if a third party knows where the two of you are.
I've often thought outcalls were safer than incall. If visiting the gentleman at his residence or hotel, I will have at the very least his full name. If something happens in a hotel, screams will be heard - and the hotel staff knows exactly who is in that room.
I know there was an incident a couple months back where one of the Calgary escorts was murdered at a residence she went to. Acutally it may have been one of the Edmonton escorts - I can't recall the city. It was tragic. However, I think it was more the exception than the rule.
If you are planning on hurting someone, you really don't want to do it in a place that is associated with you - especially if a third party knows where the two of you are.
When you come into someone's home, you lose home court advantage. You give him latitude to say that he told you to leave but you would not, he can start breaking up his stuff and say that you did it an he had to do shit to you to protect his home.
http://edmontonsun.com/HotClicks/2008/09/16/6816451-sun.html
Just recently... That men should hurt women like this, they aren't really men at all. Scum with no self-worth or esteem.
Sigh.
Just recently... That men should hurt women like this, they aren't really men at all. Scum with no self-worth or esteem.
Sigh.
Forget that it was a woman. If a man was robbing me, I would do whatever the fuck necessary to defend myself and my property!
Don't confuse the two. He wasn't defending himself, he sexually assaulted that girl for revenge. She was an idiot, he was a sick fuck. What the other poster was pointing out was that the victim instigated the situation, not deserved the consequences.
Did you fail english comprehension in school ? Or are you a complete idiot.Read it again before you shoot your mouth off.
Not only a lowlife, but now, per your post above, an admitted criminal.
You can get more hours at Metro for your driving skills, pal.
IF I have good intentions, she doesn't neeeeeeeeeeeed you, idiot! Nor do I
You have clearly admitted to your crimes, and those of us who live on a much higher plain than you do just don't see that answering one potential crime with another is appropriate.
And now, thanks to you, we have another...
Someone else in this thread points out that the outcall in question was entirely legal, and as such, the appropriate response by you, lowlife, would be to phone the authorities and report someone being held captive against their will. Unless you yourself have something to hide from the authorities, then surely you would have chosen exactly that course of action vs. committing a crime.
The only reason you wouldn't have been prosecuted for that crime is because the property owner was, much like yourself, hiding from the police for some reason.
Which brings us back to the whole cause of prostitution putting so many people in danger - because so many like yourself seem to think that the other guy/girl won't hold you accountable with the authorities because they have something to hide themselves.
Got news for you, lowlife, most of us out here don't tend to run afoul of the law as often as you do.
Someone's a little defensive....and still missing the point completely
And that's the point...IF you have good intentions. And how is an SP to know what your intentions are before meeting you? For their protection and SP should have some back-up before going into a random clients home. But you're still too ignorant to see that. It has been illustrated many times that this is a high risk industry, and any reputable lady will take precautions. Your stance on this issue makes you seem like a predator of some kind, who needs to have the power over his SPs and i'd be surprised if any SP who see's this thread would ever do an outcall to you.
I provide safety to ladies who are in an unfamiliar place, alone with an unknown client who is usually larger physically than them. My job is simply to level the playing field IF things go awry. If you don't want a driver involved, then do incall dates. Drivers are just a part of the package that comes with outcalls.
You keep on enjoying the view from your "higher plain", and I'll keep doing my thing down here in the real world, where unfortunately girls are still not protected by the system, and require their own security measures.
Once again, if your right to absolute privacy is so much more important to you than the rights of an SP to have a safe working environment, than you are not only ignorant, but completely self-righteous...which is also obvious given the defensive tone of your posts here.
And that's the point...IF you have good intentions. And how is an SP to know what your intentions are before meeting you? For their protection and SP should have some back-up before going into a random clients home. But you're still too ignorant to see that. It has been illustrated many times that this is a high risk industry, and any reputable lady will take precautions. Your stance on this issue makes you seem like a predator of some kind, who needs to have the power over his SPs and i'd be surprised if any SP who see's this thread would ever do an outcall to you.
I provide safety to ladies who are in an unfamiliar place, alone with an unknown client who is usually larger physically than them. My job is simply to level the playing field IF things go awry. If you don't want a driver involved, then do incall dates. Drivers are just a part of the package that comes with outcalls.
The authorities were called in that instance. But, in the meantime, I responded to the frantic call I received rather than waiting for a Police response. A report was filed, and the Constable who attended told the girl "It's a good thing you had a driver nearby". I do not anticipate doing any time for this.
You keep on enjoying the view from your "higher plain", and I'll keep doing my thing down here in the real world, where unfortunately girls are still not protected by the system, and require their own security measures.
Once again, if your right to absolute privacy is so much more important to you than the rights of an SP to have a safe working environment, than you are not only ignorant, but completely self-righteous...which is also obvious given the defensive tone of your posts here.
Maybe this will help him "get it"
I too would think that no sp contacted thru this site via pm would see SSRsp.
You are quite probably the most ignorant fuck ever to come across these boards. I hope some ladies know exactly who you are and refuse service to you because you are a selfish, close minded asshole looking out for no one but himself.
The girl in the paper DID have a driver. HE LEFT. She screamed til the neighbors could hear her, and he would have heard he had he waited outside or a couple doors down like he was paid to do. Which he didn't. This case is different because her driver was the owner of the agency. An uncommon case.
Most agencies requires drivers to get screened and to get security background checks.
I myself have had a case or two where if not for my driver, I may have been harmed.
Where the hell do you get off calling these people a lowlife or accusing a lady of shooting up?
Many of these women have at least one university degree and are in this business because they ENJOY it. Some are working towards something better.
You really should take your head out of your ass and just stop calling SPs because CLEARLY you don't like the practices of it if it doesn't benefit you somehow.
