PERB In Need of Banner

Edmonton's Top SP??

Status
Not open for further replies.

dahamma

New member
Oct 3, 2010
80
0
0
camera's???? really ????...I have no SO or a GF....so cameras and video would be totally cool with me ...my left side is best hahaha
 

dahamma

New member
Oct 3, 2010
80
0
0
camera's???? really ????...I have no SO or a GF....so cameras and video would be totally cool with me ...my left side is best hahaha
strike a pose .....hahahahaha
 

Pillowtalk

Banned
Feb 11, 2010
1,037
3
0
You folks do know how this is going to end, right?

May we suggest that .... before we have a poll to bring back ... and this time it will be multiple names & members... that everyone stop making inflamatory posts, NOW!

Congrats are due to Moderator-1, who today reached his/her 500th post!! (thx to the recent bannings in perbatory, everyone did their part, just helping you out, buddy!)
 

SeekSteadyRegSP

Active member
Feb 9, 2005
773
100
43
i know digger doesn't need me to stick up for him.

how did digger spill the beans on anyone. JPR is the one who came on Perb and started a thread about herself talking to Diggers SO. news to me that Digger started that thread. how did JPR get drug down this "two way street" you refer to. seems to me that Digger's life has probably been chaos since. not the other way around.

know what you are talking about before wrongfully placing blame.

Sir, you obviously don't have a clue:

"JPR" coming onto PERB has almost nothing to do with any of this... that's all the aftermath.

The FACTS (which you seem so willing to overlook) are that Digger compromised JPR's personal contact information while at the same time believing that he himself was due some mythical discretion from her.

Clearly we can already see how Digger conducts himself where it concerns implicit mutual discretion... and as such, it is probably only fitting if indeed "Digger's life has... been chaos since" (brought on entirely by himself. PERB is just the medium by which you ever got to be entertained by it)
 

SeekSteadyRegSP

Active member
Feb 9, 2005
773
100
43
I kinda have to go with 69's reply to this. I really don't understand...

I think that's redundancy at its finest.


how it is that you could come to the conclusion that I had something to gain or stood to gain anything. I apparently had lots to lose.

As far as being careless with the contact info, I don't deny it was taken from my phone but it wasn't as if it was as easy as picking it up off the kitchen counter...

So wait, a guy with nothing at all to gain, and lots to lose, still isn't guarding the personal contact information of someone with whom he shares the responsibility of an implicit mutual agreement about discretion?


That sounds like a poor risk.
 

ThisEndUp

mort à l'entente
Congrats are due to Moderator-1, who today reached his/her 500th post!! (thx to the recent bannings in perbatory, everyone did their part, just helping you out, buddy!)
well get a cake, some booze, dancing girls, party hats, thats lots of bannings
 

69guy

Active member
Sep 24, 2006
1,022
11
38
Sir, you obviously don't have a clue:

"JPR" coming onto PERB has almost nothing to do with any of this... that's all the aftermath.

The FACTS (which you seem so willing to overlook) are that Digger compromised JPR's personal contact information while at the same time believing that he himself was due some mythical discretion from her.

Clearly we can already see how Digger conducts himself where it concerns implicit mutual discretion... and as such, it is probably only fitting if indeed "Digger's life has... been chaos since" (brought on entirely by himself. PERB is just the medium by which you ever got to be entertained by it)
i am not getting into a pissing match with you. JPR came onto PERB to tell everyone that she had just talked to Digger's wife. telling her who she was, and everything else. it was not Digger whom came on here and started that thread PLAIN AND SIMPLE. so therefore, JPR got herself involved in it. not only on here, but by talking to Digger's wife, when she could have simply told her to talk to her husband about everything.

i totally get that Digger fucked up by leaving JPR's contact info on his cell. that was his fault i agree. i think JPR did owe him some discretion after all is said and done.

look at it from a different perspective. do you not think that if i saw my ATF in public, and just walked up to her, called her by her SP name, and started talking to her, with no regard for anything, that she would be pisssed and would more than likely never wanna have me as a client? it is called mutual respect for a reason. i know for a fact that there is a ton of it between myself and Kendra, Lilith, Cassidy, and Mika just to name a few.

ya Digger did fuck up. but guess what JPR didn't exactly help the situation out.
 

SeekSteadyRegSP

Active member
Feb 9, 2005
773
100
43
i am not getting into a pissing match with you. JPR came onto PERB to tell everyone that she had just talked to Digger's wife. telling her who she was, and everything else. it was not Digger whom came on here and started that thread PLAIN AND SIMPLE. so therefore, JPR got herself involved in it. not only on here, but by talking to Digger's wife, when she could have simply told her to talk to her husband about everything.

i totally get that Digger fucked up by leaving JPR's contact info on his cell. that was his fault i agree. i think JPR did owe him some discretion after all is said and done.

look at it from a different perspective. do you not think that if i saw my ATF in public, and just walked up to her, called her by her SP name, and started talking to her, with no regard for anything, that she would be pisssed and would more than likely never wanna have me as a client? it is called mutual respect for a reason. i know for a fact that there is a ton of it between myself and Kendra, Lilith, Cassidy, and Mika just to name a few.

ya Digger did fuck up. but guess what JPR didn't exactly help the situation out.


JPR coming onto PERB was looooooooooooooooong after the fact. Who cares about the thread? It merely described the steps as they transpired.

As we are all in this same arena where mutual discretion is implicit, I will imagine that you can grasp that simple concept.

Nowthen... JPR is living her private life... sharing it with her people... when the phone rings... and voila, SOMEbody from god knows where is invading her private family time... now who do you think it is?

That's right! - it's a family member of one of JPR's former clients, to whom said former client had no business communicating via smoke signal, magic wand, carrier pigeon, or magic telephone left unattended on the kitchen counter... her personal contact information.


The initial salvo in this fun-filled, action-packed drama was fired by DIGGER himself.

You don't seem to have any understanding whatsoever of the meaning of the word "mutual" should you feel otherwise.


All that anyone in this business has in the way of insurance against indiscretion on the part of others met here, is the possibility that the other side may be compromised in the process of one side being compromised.

Now very clearly, it was Digger, and only Digger, who first violated what you yourself assure is "mutual respect".
 

Shibarimaster

My Kung Fu is Strong!
Apr 11, 2009
61
2
0
The Lava Lounge
And really,if you want to be more accurate about who communicated the "personal contact information" to the SO, it was Jessica herself when she sent the pic/text to my phone which was charging in my garage. The info wouldn't have been there if she hadn't have sent it.
So basically Digger what you are saying is; JPR completely out of the blue and after not ever having contact with you via text messages in the past just sent a picture and a message to your phone, I seriously doubt that! You are trying to say that you and JPR were not having conversations via text messages, and were not already talking before she sent that pic? Come on, why not just tell the truth, you two had been and were engaged in conversation via that venue and she was merely sending you something in response to an earlier text from you. You had requested pictures from her did you not? You had previous conversations with her and asked for very specific photos of her to be sent you you, did you not?

Now before you answer please be aware that I do have access to JPR's cell and can very much back up the truth, be it with a screen shot of said messages, or I am quite sure that she can put them up on her website for everyone to read.
 
Last edited:

Pillowtalk

Banned
Feb 11, 2010
1,037
3
0
So basically Digger what you are saying is; JPR completely out of the blue and after not ever having contact with you via text messages in the past just sent a picture and a message to your phone, I seriously doubt that! You are trying to say that you and JPR were not having conversations via text messages, and were not already talking before she sent that pic? Come on, why not just tell the truth, you two had been and were engaged in conversation via that venue and she was merely sending you something in response to an earlier text from you.
Not to belabour the point, but unless he sent something to her stating implicitly that she can call/text/email anything anytime or place, or unless he sent her a message at 4AM, and she replied within an hour, then what she was probably doing (based on what i see here) was sending an unsolicited "ad", in hopes he would respond with a booking.

It makes just as much sense to assume that (which is actually another do-not-do) than that they were happily in the middle of a conversation. As he said, the phone was on charge and the message came in while charging. Not exactly in conversation at that time.

I'll just quote Victoria Jolie, as a reminder about professionalism:

Many clients do not wish to be contact without their permission..as by email or phone...Unless you have told her that it was okay to do so previously the event...

I now see it even more as a pure act of unprofessionalism

Even so, she replied on her business line, and answered a phone call that came in on her business line, so I would assume she was looking to do business, not hanging out with friends and family with an unexpected work-related call came in on her home phone lol. Interesting viewpoint, tho, for the one who suggested that digger revealed personal info about an sp. Last time I checked, photos from ads/sites and a work # isn't exactly private.
 

Pillowtalk

Banned
Feb 11, 2010
1,037
3
0
Hmm, the number of that phone is kinda posted up on a couple of rather racy websites. I'm pretty sure it's posted in a few places on this particular site. If she wasn't prepared to talk shop, maybe not answering the work phone would have been an option.


What do you mean jpr comming on to perb was way after the fact? She posted the very same day.


And really,if you want to be more accurate about who communicated the "personal contact information" to the SO, it was Jessica herself when she sent the pic/text to my phone which was charging in my garage. The info wouldn't have been there if she hadn't have sent it.

It kinda gets a bit less clear when you look at it that way. (<---that would look way more dramatic if I knew how to write in those large colorful letters like you use SeekSteady)
:cool::D

It's the A button between Sizes and the smiley face button.

Just helping you out, dude.
 

Pillowtalk

Banned
Feb 11, 2010
1,037
3
0
Now before you answer please be aware that I do have access to JPR's cell and can very much back up the truth, be it with a screen shot of said messages, or I am quite sure that she can put them up on her website for everyone to read.
You added this, lol.

And to respond to this statement, which I am quoting because it is so fricking insane, are you fricking kidding me??!!

You are saying, if indeed you are a client and not a multi handle of jpr, whichever is worse who knows, that JPR is sharing with you the personal contact info of her client, including and not limited to messages from and to her??
 

Shibarimaster

My Kung Fu is Strong!
Apr 11, 2009
61
2
0
The Lava Lounge
Not to belabour the point, but unless he sent something to her stating implicitly that she can call/text/email anything anytime or place, or unless he sent her a message at 4AM, and she replied within an hour, then what she was probably doing (based on what i see here) was sending an unsolicited "ad", in hopes he would respond with a booking.

It makes just as much sense to assume that (which is actually another do-not-do) than that they were happily in the middle of a conversation. As he said, the phone was on charge and the message came in while charging. Not exactly in conversation at that time.

I'll just quote Victoria Jolie, as a reminder about professionalism:




Even so, she replied on her business line, and answered a phone call that came in on her business line, so I would assume she was looking to do business, not hanging out with friends and family with an unexpected work-related call came in on her home phone lol. Interesting viewpoint, tho, for the one who suggested that digger revealed personal info about an sp. Last time I checked, photos from ads/sites and a work # isn't exactly private.
Interesting point, I'll be it a mute one though because the photos were specifically asked for and sent to him at his request.
 

athaire

Inactive Pooner
Aug 18, 2006
2,464
14
38
59
Land of the living skies
So basically Digger what you are saying is; JPR completely out of the blue and after not ever having contact with you via text messages in the past just sent a picture and a message to your phone, I seriously doubt that! You are trying to say that you and JPR were not having conversations via text messages, and were not already talking before she sent that pic? Come on, why not just tell the truth, you two had been and were engaged in conversation via that venue and she was merely sending you something in response to an earlier text from you. You had requested pictures from her did you not? You had previous conversations with her and asked for very specific photos of her to be sent you you, did you not?

Now before you answer please be aware that I do have access to JPR's cell and can very much back up the truth, be it with a screen shot of said messages, or I am quite sure that she can put them up on her website for everyone to read.
And how is it that you have access to a providers work phone? Who else has access to this phone? It seems to me that giving anyone access to her work phone is a blunder in and of itself. I am now concerned for the many other clients she has stored in that phone that have been comprimised by allowing someone to avail themselves of the info on a providers work phone....unbelievable....or are you another multiple handle of hers and this is why you have access?
Not trying for drama here......mearly looking to clarify stated info.......
 

athaire

Inactive Pooner
Aug 18, 2006
2,464
14
38
59
Land of the living skies
You added this, lol.

And to respond to this statement, which I am quoting because it is so fricking insane, are you fricking kidding me??!!

You are saying, if indeed you are a client and not a multi handle of jpr, whichever is worse who knows, that JPR is sharing with you the personal contact info of her client, including and not limited to messages from and to her??
LOL......my thoughts as well......
 

Shibarimaster

My Kung Fu is Strong!
Apr 11, 2009
61
2
0
The Lava Lounge
You added this, lol.

And to respond to this statement, which I am quoting because it is so fricking insane, are you fricking kidding me??!!

You are saying, if indeed you are a client and not a multi handle of jpr, whichever is worse who knows, that JPR is sharing with you the personal contact info of her client, including and not limited to messages from and to her??
I never said that now did I.

She has not nor will ever share any personal details of Digger with me or anyone else, I do not know his real name, phone number or anything other than his screen name here on the board.

JPR has mentioned to me though that she would be willing to post on her website the conversations that have transpired, with no other details than the texts themselves.

So in other words, relax, there is no sharing of personal info going on at all.
 

athaire

Inactive Pooner
Aug 18, 2006
2,464
14
38
59
Land of the living skies
I never said that now did I.

She has not nor will ever share any personal details of Digger with me or anyone else,
That isn't entirely true as her admission to sharing info with Digger's wife kina blows this statement out of the water IMO. She has shown that she is willing to share his info already. And by stating she will post text info she is continuing the trend.

And we are to trust these text messages without accompanied info proving Digger did indeed do as you say because why? She said so? Surely you jest right?
 

Shibarimaster

My Kung Fu is Strong!
Apr 11, 2009
61
2
0
The Lava Lounge
That isn't entirely true as her admission to sharing info with Digger's wife kina blows this statement out of the water IMO. She has shown that she is willing to share his info already. And by stating she will post text info she is continuing the trend.

And we are to trust these text messages without accompanied info proving Digger did indeed do as you say because why? She said so? Surely you jest right?
Um ya, Diggers wife kinda knows his personnal details.

Well I am sure that if requested by everyone to know the truth she could put up the name that the texts are coming from...lol. Then of course we would have another blow up over this despite the fact that she would be proven right.
 

athaire

Inactive Pooner
Aug 18, 2006
2,464
14
38
59
Land of the living skies
Um ya, Diggers wife kinda knows his personnal details.

Well I am sure that if requested by everyone to know the truth she could put up the name that the texts are coming from...lol. Then of course we would have another blow up over this despite the fact that she would be proven right.
Ummmmm ya your right she does, she just didn't know about the Client/provider info until your girl spilled her guts. So again the trend seems to be there with regard to her sharing details unknown to another party. Semantics aside she posted as much in the now infamous lounge thread.

Since you are soooo well informed Shib/JPR perhaps you could give us a time line? He asked for the pics how long before they were delivered to him? An hour? A min? 6 hours? Please enlighten us as to how professional your girl is. If a client requests pics and she agrees you would think that would happen right away and not have a lag in between where the client would put his phone on charge, unattended.......seems to me that he wasn't expecting the pics and thus she would have to wear the blame.....and before you answer remember Digger has the texts as well....

The more she tries to be "Right" the more she seems very very wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vancouver Escorts