strike a pose .....hahahahahacamera's???? really ????...I have no SO or a GF....so cameras and video would be totally cool with me ...my left side is best hahaha
You folks do know how this is going to end, right?
May we suggest that .... before we have a poll to bring back ... and this time it will be multiple names & members... that everyone stop making inflamatory posts, NOW!
i know digger doesn't need me to stick up for him.
how did digger spill the beans on anyone. JPR is the one who came on Perb and started a thread about herself talking to Diggers SO. news to me that Digger started that thread. how did JPR get drug down this "two way street" you refer to. seems to me that Digger's life has probably been chaos since. not the other way around.
know what you are talking about before wrongfully placing blame.
I kinda have to go with 69's reply to this. I really don't understand...
how it is that you could come to the conclusion that I had something to gain or stood to gain anything. I apparently had lots to lose.
As far as being careless with the contact info, I don't deny it was taken from my phone but it wasn't as if it was as easy as picking it up off the kitchen counter...
well get a cake, some booze, dancing girls, party hats, thats lots of banningsCongrats are due to Moderator-1, who today reached his/her 500th post!! (thx to the recent bannings in perbatory, everyone did their part, just helping you out, buddy!)
i am not getting into a pissing match with you. JPR came onto PERB to tell everyone that she had just talked to Digger's wife. telling her who she was, and everything else. it was not Digger whom came on here and started that thread PLAIN AND SIMPLE. so therefore, JPR got herself involved in it. not only on here, but by talking to Digger's wife, when she could have simply told her to talk to her husband about everything.Sir, you obviously don't have a clue:
"JPR" coming onto PERB has almost nothing to do with any of this... that's all the aftermath.
The FACTS (which you seem so willing to overlook) are that Digger compromised JPR's personal contact information while at the same time believing that he himself was due some mythical discretion from her.
Clearly we can already see how Digger conducts himself where it concerns implicit mutual discretion... and as such, it is probably only fitting if indeed "Digger's life has... been chaos since" (brought on entirely by himself. PERB is just the medium by which you ever got to be entertained by it)
i am not getting into a pissing match with you. JPR came onto PERB to tell everyone that she had just talked to Digger's wife. telling her who she was, and everything else. it was not Digger whom came on here and started that thread PLAIN AND SIMPLE. so therefore, JPR got herself involved in it. not only on here, but by talking to Digger's wife, when she could have simply told her to talk to her husband about everything.
i totally get that Digger fucked up by leaving JPR's contact info on his cell. that was his fault i agree. i think JPR did owe him some discretion after all is said and done.
look at it from a different perspective. do you not think that if i saw my ATF in public, and just walked up to her, called her by her SP name, and started talking to her, with no regard for anything, that she would be pisssed and would more than likely never wanna have me as a client? it is called mutual respect for a reason. i know for a fact that there is a ton of it between myself and Kendra, Lilith, Cassidy, and Mika just to name a few.
ya Digger did fuck up. but guess what JPR didn't exactly help the situation out.
So basically Digger what you are saying is; JPR completely out of the blue and after not ever having contact with you via text messages in the past just sent a picture and a message to your phone, I seriously doubt that! You are trying to say that you and JPR were not having conversations via text messages, and were not already talking before she sent that pic? Come on, why not just tell the truth, you two had been and were engaged in conversation via that venue and she was merely sending you something in response to an earlier text from you. You had requested pictures from her did you not? You had previous conversations with her and asked for very specific photos of her to be sent you you, did you not?And really,if you want to be more accurate about who communicated the "personal contact information" to the SO, it was Jessica herself when she sent the pic/text to my phone which was charging in my garage. The info wouldn't have been there if she hadn't have sent it.
Not to belabour the point, but unless he sent something to her stating implicitly that she can call/text/email anything anytime or place, or unless he sent her a message at 4AM, and she replied within an hour, then what she was probably doing (based on what i see here) was sending an unsolicited "ad", in hopes he would respond with a booking.So basically Digger what you are saying is; JPR completely out of the blue and after not ever having contact with you via text messages in the past just sent a picture and a message to your phone, I seriously doubt that! You are trying to say that you and JPR were not having conversations via text messages, and were not already talking before she sent that pic? Come on, why not just tell the truth, you two had been and were engaged in conversation via that venue and she was merely sending you something in response to an earlier text from you.
Many clients do not wish to be contact without their permission..as by email or phone...Unless you have told her that it was okay to do so previously the event...
I now see it even more as a pure act of unprofessionalism
Hmm, the number of that phone is kinda posted up on a couple of rather racy websites. I'm pretty sure it's posted in a few places on this particular site. If she wasn't prepared to talk shop, maybe not answering the work phone would have been an option.
What do you mean jpr comming on to perb was way after the fact? She posted the very same day.
And really,if you want to be more accurate about who communicated the "personal contact information" to the SO, it was Jessica herself when she sent the pic/text to my phone which was charging in my garage. The info wouldn't have been there if she hadn't have sent it.
It kinda gets a bit less clear when you look at it that way. (<---that would look way more dramatic if I knew how to write in those large colorful letters like you use SeekSteady)
You added this, lol.Now before you answer please be aware that I do have access to JPR's cell and can very much back up the truth, be it with a screen shot of said messages, or I am quite sure that she can put them up on her website for everyone to read.
Interesting point, I'll be it a mute one though because the photos were specifically asked for and sent to him at his request.Not to belabour the point, but unless he sent something to her stating implicitly that she can call/text/email anything anytime or place, or unless he sent her a message at 4AM, and she replied within an hour, then what she was probably doing (based on what i see here) was sending an unsolicited "ad", in hopes he would respond with a booking.
It makes just as much sense to assume that (which is actually another do-not-do) than that they were happily in the middle of a conversation. As he said, the phone was on charge and the message came in while charging. Not exactly in conversation at that time.
I'll just quote Victoria Jolie, as a reminder about professionalism:
Even so, she replied on her business line, and answered a phone call that came in on her business line, so I would assume she was looking to do business, not hanging out with friends and family with an unexpected work-related call came in on her home phone lol. Interesting viewpoint, tho, for the one who suggested that digger revealed personal info about an sp. Last time I checked, photos from ads/sites and a work # isn't exactly private.
And how is it that you have access to a providers work phone? Who else has access to this phone? It seems to me that giving anyone access to her work phone is a blunder in and of itself. I am now concerned for the many other clients she has stored in that phone that have been comprimised by allowing someone to avail themselves of the info on a providers work phone....unbelievable....or are you another multiple handle of hers and this is why you have access?So basically Digger what you are saying is; JPR completely out of the blue and after not ever having contact with you via text messages in the past just sent a picture and a message to your phone, I seriously doubt that! You are trying to say that you and JPR were not having conversations via text messages, and were not already talking before she sent that pic? Come on, why not just tell the truth, you two had been and were engaged in conversation via that venue and she was merely sending you something in response to an earlier text from you. You had requested pictures from her did you not? You had previous conversations with her and asked for very specific photos of her to be sent you you, did you not?
Now before you answer please be aware that I do have access to JPR's cell and can very much back up the truth, be it with a screen shot of said messages, or I am quite sure that she can put them up on her website for everyone to read.
LOL......my thoughts as well......You added this, lol.
And to respond to this statement, which I am quoting because it is so fricking insane, are you fricking kidding me??!!
You are saying, if indeed you are a client and not a multi handle of jpr, whichever is worse who knows, that JPR is sharing with you the personal contact info of her client, including and not limited to messages from and to her??
I never said that now did I.You added this, lol.
And to respond to this statement, which I am quoting because it is so fricking insane, are you fricking kidding me??!!
You are saying, if indeed you are a client and not a multi handle of jpr, whichever is worse who knows, that JPR is sharing with you the personal contact info of her client, including and not limited to messages from and to her??
That isn't entirely true as her admission to sharing info with Digger's wife kina blows this statement out of the water IMO. She has shown that she is willing to share his info already. And by stating she will post text info she is continuing the trend.I never said that now did I.
She has not nor will ever share any personal details of Digger with me or anyone else,
Um ya, Diggers wife kinda knows his personnal details.That isn't entirely true as her admission to sharing info with Digger's wife kina blows this statement out of the water IMO. She has shown that she is willing to share his info already. And by stating she will post text info she is continuing the trend.
And we are to trust these text messages without accompanied info proving Digger did indeed do as you say because why? She said so? Surely you jest right?
Ummmmm ya your right she does, she just didn't know about the Client/provider info until your girl spilled her guts. So again the trend seems to be there with regard to her sharing details unknown to another party. Semantics aside she posted as much in the now infamous lounge thread.Um ya, Diggers wife kinda knows his personnal details.
Well I am sure that if requested by everyone to know the truth she could put up the name that the texts are coming from...lol. Then of course we would have another blow up over this despite the fact that she would be proven right.





