Why put themselves at risk by offering BBBJ? I think because it is{snip} I see getting greek during a session a bonus and I will only do it if the lady I'm with is comfortable doing it. As for BBBJ, the reason most women don't offer it is because of health concerns, which is understandable. So my question is, why put you and your clients health at potential risk for and extra $50??? I find that kind of unsettling. Again, something I see as a bonus if I get it, not a requirement but I won't pay extra for it. I appreciate the risk that comes with BBBJ and will only engage in it with ladies who are willing to take that risk with me (although from what I've read here on PERB, it's relatively minimal).
considered a minimal risk. Would it be any riskier than, say, smooching
or genital intercourse? After all, condoms can be defective, break, and
cum off, during the act. They can also become damaged or punctured,
either purposely or by accident. Do they maintain their integrity after
one to three hours of boom boom? I guess that if the only risk SPs
had to worry about was from a BBBJ, they'd probably feel a lot better.
Most SP's may not offer BBBJ on their website, but i suggest that
many of them secretly provide the service, especially for regulars,
even if they deny it. They want to keep the business image of being
a safe clean girl, to attract a certain type of clientele. Other SPs
openly offer BBBJ to attract another class of customer.
BTW amongst SWs BBBJ is quite common. But some will refuse while
feeling quite comfortable with kissing. And vica versa. So if a guy finds
a lady who is an angelic kisser but does not offer BBBJ, he will need
another SP should he also be interested in fabulous BBBJ's. Likewise
if the angelic kisser offers BBBJ but is not very skilled in that area.
Personally i find that a CBJ can feel just as good as a BBBJ, if it is
done right. This includes but is not limited to visual aids, such as
a mirror for side viewing pleasure, a see through clear condom, and
no hair obstructions.






