This issue has come up in chats with friends. One female friend is a member of The Leche League, which is a group of people (mostly women) who promote breast feeding. My brother's wife is a Doctorate of Nursing and she is also big on breast feeding. They both trumpet the same benefits, that is, it helps the immune system of the baby, etc. I find that this seems to make sense, but at the same time I've known 2 women who did not breast feed their kids beyond the first week, and they've grown up strong and healthy. The two brothers are each 6 feet tall and have never had health problems. The one sister and one brother are also strong and healthy. So I do wonder about the health benefits, but that is not my main area of interest (since I have no way to have kids anyway).
There is the contentious issue of breast sag. I was once in the company of a plastic surgeon, who said that a great fraction of his clients are women who have breast fed and he was doing a lot of breast lifts. The Leche League and my brother's wife are adamant that breast feeding has no relation to sagging of breasts. I think there is nothing magical about it, that as skin stretches to accomodate a larger mass within, and when that mass is taken away, the limited elasticity of the skin will not bring the original shape back - and thus sagging. Breast feeding, I believe, helps to continue the production of milk and thus increases the mass behind the skin - thus the eventual sag. But of course, I could be wrong.
It's a political issue, it seems. Groups that take a feminist slant, such as The Leche League and academics such as that Doctorate of Nursing, seem to want to only look at the absence of evidence that links breast sag to breast feeding. They want women (and their mates) to feel comfortable with the idea that no breast sag will occur if there is breast feeding, but of course, it is the woman who has to live with the outcome should it occur.
Your opinions please.
There is the contentious issue of breast sag. I was once in the company of a plastic surgeon, who said that a great fraction of his clients are women who have breast fed and he was doing a lot of breast lifts. The Leche League and my brother's wife are adamant that breast feeding has no relation to sagging of breasts. I think there is nothing magical about it, that as skin stretches to accomodate a larger mass within, and when that mass is taken away, the limited elasticity of the skin will not bring the original shape back - and thus sagging. Breast feeding, I believe, helps to continue the production of milk and thus increases the mass behind the skin - thus the eventual sag. But of course, I could be wrong.
It's a political issue, it seems. Groups that take a feminist slant, such as The Leche League and academics such as that Doctorate of Nursing, seem to want to only look at the absence of evidence that links breast sag to breast feeding. They want women (and their mates) to feel comfortable with the idea that no breast sag will occur if there is breast feeding, but of course, it is the woman who has to live with the outcome should it occur.
Your opinions please.





