Poll: Merging vanman's threads

[Herb_The_Perb]

Fred Zed wrote:
"I can merge Vancouverman's threads into 1, 2 or 3 long threads ..no problem."
Which would you prefer?

 

[lenny]

Like Vman said, it is the future not the past that is the concern.
That is, the future monopoly & domination of the first page of
the lounge by new threads started by him. Fred may have better
things to do than babysitting this situation every day. But if
Vman could do it himself & put all his new threads into 1-3 per
day, that would help.

 

[vancouverman]

lenny ... and why should I????????????

tell me the reason, not to try to be just another asshat here?

 

[lenny]

lenny ... and why should I????????????

tell me the reason, not to try to be just another asshat here?

Common courtesy.

You are pissing off a lot of people.

Wasting their time.

It's like posting in all capitals.

 

[vancouverman]

Common courtesy.

You are pissing off a lot of people.

Wasting their time.

It's like posting in all capitals.

hmmm.....
am I the only one who is pissing off people here? ... nope ..... so please get off my case

and how come posting in capitals has anything to do with wasting anybody time?

 

[hitrack]

If I were the mod

I would just create a "hot chicks" thread and sticky it. This is a board about chicks after all. Then if Vman or any others find new pr0n that they need to share just toss it in there. Besides that it'll be like always having a date for Saturday night....for most of you.

Who cares if the thread grows to like 40 pages long.

 

[lenny]

hmmm.....
am I the only one who is pissing off people here? ... nope ..... so please get off my case

and how come posting in capitals has anything to do with wasting anybody time?

No, you are not the only one. Others do annoying things as well.
And they hear about it. Then they choose to either continue in
their ways, compromise, or sulk away.

Posting in caps shows ignorance, lack of courtesy, just as monopolozing
the front page & wasting people's time does.

Any reason you can't consolidate your new thread rate down to, oh,
say 5 or 10 a day? It's up to you.

 

[Hardatwork]

Common courtesy.

You are pissing off a lot of people.

Wasting their time.

It's like posting in all capitals.

Maybe it pisses people off when PERBerts post more than once a day... do we want to make a rule that you can only post once a day? How about if you don't use a spell checker? If you start new threads on the even minutes and respond on the odd minutes? I think you can see where I'm going with this...

If he's not banned or been warned by the Mods why place limits on him? He posts within the rules of PERB and plays by the same 90 second rule that everyone else does, why does that annoy you or anyone else?

 

[lenny]

Maybe it pisses people off when PERBerts post more than once a day... do we want to make a rule that you can only post once a day?

That & what he is doing, esp yesterday, are IMO like day & night.

It has been escalating lately to the point of absurdity.

 

[Bull]

Your poll omitted the option of "None of the above".

 

[vancouverman]

lenny ... most perbertian thinks what I do is a good thing ... or they don`t care ..... the numbers are against you, and a small group that you represent

see the poll results

 

[Herb_The_Perb]

If I were the mod

I would just create a "hot chicks" thread and sticky it. This is a board about chicks after all. Then if Vman or any others find new pr0n that they need to share just toss it in there. Besides that it'll be like always having a date for Saturday night....for most of you.

Who cares if the thread grows to like 40 pages long.

A very good suggestion.
I'll support that enthusiastically.

 

[Herb_The_Perb]

lenny ... most perbertian thinks what I do is a good thing ... or they don`t care ..... the numbers are against you, and a small group that you represent

see the poll results

That`s a total misrepresentation -- at the moment, 7 are for your flooding, 11 are against it, and 7 don`t care.

 

[lenny]

lenny ... most perbertian thinks what I do is a good thing ... or they don`t care ..... the numbers are against you, and a small group that you represent

see the poll results

I`d say poll options 3, 5-9 are against you = 11 votes

I`d say poll options 1-2 are for you...........= 7 votes

 

[Bull]

Everytime a vanman thread is cut, suppressed, pruned or mereged....I'll post another picture....

 

[Herb_The_Perb]

Your poll omitted the option of "None of the above".

I was simply repeating what Fred Zed offered.

 

[vancouverman]

lenny .... 7 don't care... so it means.... I can do as I did before .....

 

[Herb_The_Perb]

lenny .... 7 don't care... so it means.... I can do as I did before .....

Vanman, please forgive me if this question is too personal, but how old are you?

 

[Hardatwork]

I'd say poll options 3, 5-9 are against you = 11 votes

I'd say poll options 1-2 are for you...........= 7 votes

If these poll options are correct with 2 poll options for vs. 6 poll options against, isn't that a biased and unfair poll?

 

[lenny]

lenny .... 7 don't care... so it means.... I can do as I did before .....

They don't care...maybe because they weren't here over the weekend
when things escalated.