Is he just trolling, trying to start shit or is he actually seriously giving this as arguments?
He's trolling, right?
Personally i wouldn't support any that are pro abortion/infanticide/murder.
Whatever Lenny, I prefer those who support a woman's right to make decisions that concern her own body. You seem to think you're entitled to call the shots here. Let me clarify this for you and hopefully clear up any misunderstandings here: No one's asking you to support anything, no one needs your support or your approval either.
Besides, you participate in infanticide/murder most likely at least once a day: The animals that are killed because you think they taste good - they're actually fully formed, breathing on their own, definitely alive, aware and undeniably sentient. There's no doubt they feel everything that's inflicted upon them during their short, miserable life and because they also have complex cognitive capacities and the same instinctual will to live, they don't willingly volunteer to have their throat slit (hopefully after being stunned properly but that's hit and miss really) and get to experience the intense stress and fear while they are led to be slaughtered.
That sounds a
hell of of a lot more gruesome and a lot closer to murder to me. Yet that doesn't stop you from supporting they're violent and premature death for no reason other than finding their flesh tasty. No one has abortion for their personal pleasure. The animals you eat are basically infants. At most, juveniles. No one intentionally gets pregnant to have an abortion because they think it's tasty. (I'm not trying to offend all meat eaters - just those hypocritical enough to make bs comments about "infanticide" and "murder". I'm very sorry but I'm not letting that pass without pointing out how ridiculous it is.)
Don't give me that shit about some big moral objection to womens' right to decide - a position you'll conveniently never have to be in. Don't give me that kind of inflammatory BULL, while your morals about the sacredness of life is obviously limited to those situations that don't entail any discomfort or sacrifice for you personally.
I don't and i think the lord agrees with me. Two wrongs don't make a right.
And adding a second wrong to the first, which is even worse, doesn't
correct the first wrong.
Considering that the baby infant inside her is also a woman 50% of the time,
it is evident they should have equal rights to life and neither should have the
right to murder the other.
If my life is at "risk", does that give me the right to murder someone else.
Thou shalt not murder. End of discussion.
End of discussion? Who's discussion? The one you're having with yourself (and your imaginary bearded buddy up in the clouds?) maybe. But I wasn't aware your opinion was actually relevant in "the"
actual discussion on women's choices. It's one of those discussion where its understood that unless you have the mandatory uterus, you don't get to decide when the discussion starts or ends. You're an observer and you get your chance to give your opinion if you want - you don't get to call the shots or "end the discussion".
"Thou shalt not kill", you say? (it doesn't say murder, it says kills. Isn't that pretty basic? But anyway..)
So...what of the other 9 commandments? I wasn't aware you could just pick and choose whichever ones to follow and ignore those that weren't convenient? Is your bearded man in the clouds cool with that? Cause I was under the impression that "Thou shalt not fornicate" was pretty non negotiable within that crowd? Actually, I'm pretty sure there are lots of loopholes to get around the killing commandment (I mean if there are loopholes to justify war and genocide in the name of religion/god for example...) but fornication seems to be pretty solid and straightfoward (well, not counting the tried and true "pedophile priest" option but not everyone's cut out for that so that's not usually a good option), I always figured it would be harder to bypass. How did you manage?
Or did the bearded dude in the clouds personally give you his blessing to go right ahead and exploit others' poverty, bad situations or addictions and not even worry about that one silly commandment? Pfffft. 1st, bearded man in the cloud talking to you through Outdated storybook after countless translations, interpretations from its original purpose of maintaining order amongst populations of illiterate. Sorry to say this but seriously!
2nd, I can understand a bunch of uncivilized, unhygienic and illiterate people 2000 years ago buying the fairytales but in 2011? Please. Sorry if that's offensive to some. It's not my business what you believe but don't come and tell me all that bs about infanticide/murder in reference to abortion. (I mean, if I believed in Santa Claus I'd keep that to myself, maybe a few friends - but I wouldn't bring that up to argue a point and expect others to go along) Since conveniently that is not ever going to be something you personally are faced with, who the hell are you to tell any woman what she can and cannot do? But the most absurd of it all is you're actually trying to justify it by bringing up some imaginary bearded man up in the clouds who's apparently told someone 2000 years ago? All this while you simply ignore everything else he said because it's kind of a bummer for you, You or your imaginary buddy in the clouds don't get to tell women they can't make a decision about their own bodies.
I think you were born 2000 years too late, Lenny. It's 2011 and honestly, you can keep that kind of bullshit to yourself from now on. I don't want to hear it, you don't get a vote on this so keep that crap to yourself ESPECIALLY when it has nothing to do with the OT and you're obviously just trying to start shit.
Are they still running? Perhaps the school is a better option than going to court, prison or having a criminal record.
Well, maybe but if the SA and others have their way, that wont be an option at all. Court, prison and criminal record is what you can look forward to. I'm sure they'll pray for you though.
Anyway, I had to get that out. I'm done, Troll.
