Just my observation. Low priced ladies does not include Asian micros.
F : there is no correlation between price and attractiveness. 3 of my top 5 are lower priced ladies (gala, Hailey 1122, ariel (might be lighting though)
B : I think lower priced girls are generally more fit and toned than higher priced ladies. Top 3 that comes to mind are all lower priced ladies (gala 6456, Bambi, 6456, Ariel)
S : many ladies $350+ includes dfk and cim. $300-$350 is more lfk with cim as an option sometimes. Many ladies under $300 generally don't prefer dfk or kissing at all and 50/50 offer cim for extra money
A : the higher priced ladies are generally more welcoming, friendly, and engaging during the social part. With the lower priced ladies, it ranges quite a bit socially.
In bed, lower priced ladies are more wild, while higher priced ladies are more tamed
Higher priced ladies have more grooming products available and feels more clean. I don't think the incall is more upscale as a lot like to claim. There is less ymmv, as I think they service each client the same. They all seem to follow the same routine : 40/60 social/intimate in 1 hour sessions and 50/50 in 2 hour sessions ( prepare to hear travel stories), shower, than the fun begins. It feels scripted after awhile, as every experience with a high priced lady feels the same.
With lower priced ladies, you might not know what you'll get. Sometimes the action starts right away. There might be conversation here and there. Conversation topics are more varied. I'm certain there is more ymmv. You might be rushed out or maybe stay a bit extra. You might leave feeling dirtier. I go into each session not knowing what to expect
TLDR :
No correlation between price and face/body
The higher the cost , the more likely guarantee of dfk and cim
Depending on what you like, higher priced a lot of times does not mean better experience
F : there is no correlation between price and attractiveness. 3 of my top 5 are lower priced ladies (gala, Hailey 1122, ariel (might be lighting though)
B : I think lower priced girls are generally more fit and toned than higher priced ladies. Top 3 that comes to mind are all lower priced ladies (gala 6456, Bambi, 6456, Ariel)
S : many ladies $350+ includes dfk and cim. $300-$350 is more lfk with cim as an option sometimes. Many ladies under $300 generally don't prefer dfk or kissing at all and 50/50 offer cim for extra money
A : the higher priced ladies are generally more welcoming, friendly, and engaging during the social part. With the lower priced ladies, it ranges quite a bit socially.
In bed, lower priced ladies are more wild, while higher priced ladies are more tamed
Higher priced ladies have more grooming products available and feels more clean. I don't think the incall is more upscale as a lot like to claim. There is less ymmv, as I think they service each client the same. They all seem to follow the same routine : 40/60 social/intimate in 1 hour sessions and 50/50 in 2 hour sessions ( prepare to hear travel stories), shower, than the fun begins. It feels scripted after awhile, as every experience with a high priced lady feels the same.
With lower priced ladies, you might not know what you'll get. Sometimes the action starts right away. There might be conversation here and there. Conversation topics are more varied. I'm certain there is more ymmv. You might be rushed out or maybe stay a bit extra. You might leave feeling dirtier. I go into each session not knowing what to expect
TLDR :
No correlation between price and face/body
The higher the cost , the more likely guarantee of dfk and cim
Depending on what you like, higher priced a lot of times does not mean better experience
Last edited:






