i don't get tested but i play safe with bargain girls

[Very Veronica]

WTF? I kicked an eager pse'r out of my boudoir the other nite after he guffawed this remark while sitting pantless and panting during the preliminary cocktail interrogation. It didn't help that his nose looked like a budding cauliflower either.

Moral of the story:

1. my hi priced snotty service is a WOT for indiscriminate clientelle
2. i don't care how safe you think you play, for god sake, GET TESTED!!!

ps. Just in case any of you heathens were wondering, no i did not take his money...not that it was ever offered. And while i'm on the subject and venting, what is it about guys lately and me having to ask for a donation? Can we please have that ready and in big bills? Guys may be impressed with big wads but honestly, i think most of us girls like compact ones.

Later...gotta get ready for a romantic gfe session.

 

[chump]

Holy shit who pissed in your corn flakes lately?

 

[ace85]

Vv

Guys want to beable to pay an extra $100 and give VV a facial.

For her to do this she has to feel comfortable.

She maybe wild, naughty dirty and nasty, but she isn't stupid.

Read what she says not how she says it.

It is all good information.

As far as asking for the DONATION. In certain cases I like being asked, it reminds everybody of the reality of the situation. Especially in the sex for sport situations.

 

[rockyy]

New Pooner prototype - BEWARE GURLS!!

Did he look like THIS SCUMBAG...HUH!?!?!?! He's the new model pooner they invented recently in Toronto...looks and smells nice but behind the bewitching Blue Stratos aftershave he's just a bum and a deadbeat like the rest of us....just with a slightly bigger wardrobe and vocabulary. BEWARE!

 

[mustangjoe]

= It didn't help that his nose looked like a budding cauliflower either.

hahaha...

Julia must have better luck then you.. she only gets 2 nasty guys a year.

 

[lenny]

hahaha...

Julia must have better luck then you.. she only gets 2 nasty guys a year.

She scares them away...

 

[lenny]

Which begs the question, luv, how many of your clients do you think
do not get tested & are not upfront about it.

10%, 20%, 50%?

Surely you are not so naive as to think you've never had any
untested clients?

So what are you going to do about it?

To be consistent with your actions with the honest, upfront gentleman,
dearie, maybe you should require proof of testing from all.

 

[Cosmo]

Later...gotta get ready for a romantic gfe session.

One wonders if it takes much warm up to act out that role?

 

[travel guy]

Considering the difference between "high end" and "bargain" sps in this city can be as little as a whopping 50 bucks, you've got to be kidding yourself if you think you're not sharing the same clients.

That 50 bucks doesn't exactly make for a whole new target market.

 

[rafterman]

It didn't help that his nose looked like a budding cauliflower either.

My cali nose is my most attractive feature except for the way I pant like a dog when in the presence of a hot SP!!

 

[lenny]

Considering the difference between "high end" and "bargain" sps in this city can be as little as a whopping 50 bucks, you've got to be kidding yourself if you think you're not sharing the same clients.

That 50 bucks doesn't exactly make for a whole new target market.

What if it's $20 low track SWs?

 

[hitrack]

The girls have the right to "refuse service" And by the sounds of it VV is rather popular, so it's kinda like Canadian Tire loosing a customer.....who fukkin cars about 1 guy.

But I will say it's rather small thinking to believe that when in-between paydays or what ever that the guys don't frequent the cheaper if not SW type chicks and then when times are good see the expensive broads.

 

[S.G. Gibson]

I don't want to hijack this thread but I have a question that is kind of related. When I first went to my family doctor to get an HIV test as a precaution he tried to talk me out of it. This shocked me because I always thought getting tested was the responsible thing to do. His rationale was that the government keeps track of who gets tested and how often. Private insurance companies can get access to this information and if they found out you get tested for HIV regularly they would rate you as high risk impacting your ability to get benefits. So he told me I should only get tested if I use IV drugs or have unsafe sex routinely. I insisted anyways and got tested but if what he said is true I do not want to go too regularly. Can anyone confirm or refute this insurance company thing?

 

[Creole Lady Marmalade]

I don't want to hijack this thread but I have a question that is kind of related. When I first went to my family doctor to get an HIV test as a precaution he tried to talk me out of it. This shocked me because I always thought getting tested was the responsible thing to do. His rationale was that the government keeps track of who gets tested and how often. Private insurance companies can get access to this information and if they found out you get tested for HIV regularly they would rate you as high risk impacting your ability to get benefits. So he told me I should only get tested if I use IV drugs or have unsafe sex routinely. I insisted anyways and got tested but if what he said is true I do not want to go too regularly. Can anyone confirm or refute this insurance company thing?

Okay, I hear you but there are other STDs to be concerned about. Not just HIV/AIDS.

 

[S.G. Gibson]

Mainly I just want to know if this insurance company thing is true. I'm not saying it should mean I get tested less often althought it would make me wonder what the best is to do?

 

[maverick73]

I don't want to hijack this thread but I have a question that is kind of related. When I first went to my family doctor to get an HIV test as a precaution he tried to talk me out of it. This shocked me because I always thought getting tested was the responsible thing to do. His rationale was that the government keeps track of who gets tested and how often. Private insurance companies can get access to this information and if they found out you get tested for HIV regularly they would rate you as high risk impacting your ability to get benefits. So he told me I should only get tested if I use IV drugs or have unsafe sex routinely. I insisted anyways and got tested but if what he said is true I do not want to go too regularly. Can anyone confirm or refute this insurance company thing?

What he said makes sense. Go to the 6161 Clinic on Cambie and 12th. You can get tested under an assumed name without your real medical card, SIN, or even real address or phone number.

 

[FuZzYknUckLeS]

For an SP to assume that any of her clients gets tested is a huge, and potentially disastrous mistake.

 

[travel guy]

For an SP to assume that any of her clients gets tested is a huge, and potentially disastrous mistake.

More so if they're misguided enough to prefer offering bareback services to clients who partake in bareback services with other "highend" providers over those that partake in covered services with providers deemed "bargains".

Not a bargain hunter myself, but this line of thinking is a bit over the top.

Pooner "X" indulges in BBBJ at a higher dollar amount than Pooner "Y" who indulges in covered services.

The covered service Pooner "Y" particitated in is "dirty" (must be because it's cheaper)and the bareback service Pooner "X" participated in is perfectly safe.....because it cost more.

Dangerous, but I guess in fairytale-ville, immunity to any health risk can be had for 300 bucks.

Sort of funny when you hear the same logic from sps on the next rung up who wouldn't want to do business with a guy who saw one of those dirty 300$ sps.

Vancouver is small. Everybody's sharing. Nothing's exclusive or successfully selectively targetted and unfortunately that includes STDs.

 

[hornydude]

Insurers

I don't want to hijack this thread but I have a question that is kind of related. When I first went to my family doctor to get an HIV test as a precaution he tried to talk me out of it. This shocked me because I always thought getting tested was the responsible thing to do. His rationale was that the government keeps track of who gets tested and how often. Private insurance companies can get access to this information and if they found out you get tested for HIV regularly they would rate you as high risk impacting your ability to get benefits. So he told me I should only get tested if I use IV drugs or have unsafe sex routinely. I insisted anyways and got tested but if what he said is true I do not want to go too regularly. Can anyone confirm or refute this insurance company thing?

People joke about lawyers and politicians being bad, but insurers are the last true great evil out there....I believe this 100%.

(Btw, VV, I'll be smart enough to piss the puss out of my dick before I see you....and when you ask about sw's and testing I'll lie on both counts and look you in the eye with the most convincng, grave, and seriously sincere act I've ever done ....think of that the next time you suck the tip of a client's dick ya little cougar......hehehehehe)

 

[Paris]

Holy shit who pissed in your corn flakes lately?

My Bad! How on earth does she stay in business with her attitude?????? I would say that a certain someone has a real hate on for men.

Paris/Caryn