There's no statistical reason why that would be the case but people are able to convince themselves of whatever they want to believe.I think it would be safer with a working girl, unless your are in a monogamous LTR.
There's no statistical reason why that would be the case but people are able to convince themselves of whatever they want to believe.I think it would be safer with a working girl, unless your are in a monogamous LTR.
statistically, SPs have a lower rate of STDs than civs because we take more precautions.There's no statistical reason why that would be the case but people are able to convince themselves of whatever they want to believe.
So which do you perceive as safer? A working girl or a non-monogamous relationship? Obviously a monogamous relationship should be.There's no statistical reason why that would be the case but people are able to convince themselves of whatever they want to believe.
While POONING I try to stay safe but absolutely love eating pussy, so I do take the risk in that regard. I don’t push for bbbj unless the girl just goes for it, otherwise I chose cbj. Obviously would never go for bbfs with a working girl.So which do you perceive as safer? A working girl or a non-monogamous relationship? Obviously a monogamous relationship should be.
So I just have to ask.......................................................can you explain to me how to poop safely?While pooping I try to stay safe but absolutely love eating pussy, so I do take the risk in that regard!
Bahahaha!!!So I just have to ask.......................................................can you explain to me how to poop safely?
I suppose if your in Grizzly country with your pants down ,that'd be a concern....or did someone cut the outhouse hole way to big?
I would love to see that statistic, kindly share?statistically, SPs have a lower rate of STDs than civs because we take more precautions.
The Red Cross also won't accept blood from men who actively have sex with men, even if monogamous. (You have to abstain for at least a year to be eligible.) So I would not use Red Cross eligibility as a "bright line test" for risky behaviour.Not jiving with statistics the Red Cross will use to determine who can and cannot donate blood.
Over random posters on an online forum I absolutely would use their eligibility to determine risky behavior.The Red Cross also won't accept blood from men who actively have sex with men, even if monogamous. (You have to abstain for at least a year to be eligible.) So I would not use Red Cross eligibility as a "bright line test" for risky behaviour.






