with a gunLonelyGhost said:what do you mean "finally"????
you been living in a monestary for a while? read some of VV or Julia's posts ...
georgebushmoron said:That should teach even the most pig headed out of you guys why guns should be banned.
Remember...guns don't kill people, postalworkers do!That should teach even the most pig headed out of you guys why guns should be banned.
So let's say she has a semi-automatic, and she starts shooting when people aren't facing her. A semi-automatic will take out a 5 people before anyone can react. If she shoots from behind, even a non-automatic can take out quite a few. Is everyone supposed to carry guns ever at the ready in case some nutcase suddenly starts firing?Kev said:Wrong thats why the postal workers should have had guns.
She may have gotten one shot off but after that she would have been dead.
TOUCHE
If you hit someone hard enough or long enough with one, you can snuff him out eventually...hamsuplo said:correction: guns don't kill people, bullets do.
If she hits them with a moltov cocktail, battery acid, axe or baseball bat from behind, she can take out quite a few. In the case of the first two, death, if it comes, will be painful 100% of the time. At least bullets are somewhat humane (when compared to alternative forms of death). Thanks to the evening news most people can come up with a dozen ways to kill or maim someone that they feel has wronged them (or someone the voices tell them to off). Is trying to regulate or license all (or any) of these an effective use of tax dollars when there are so many living below the poverty line (and other equally pressing issues)?georgebushmoron said:. If she shoots from behind, even a non-automatic can take out quite a few.
Guns are an offensive weapon, not a defensive weapon. Use some common sense.
This is common sense? In the world of video games, I suppose it is.butter said:If she hits them with a moltov cocktail, battery acid, axe or baseball bat from behind, she can take out quite a few. In the case of the first two, death, if it comes, will be painful 100% of the time. At least bullets are somewhat humane (when compared to alternative forms of death). ...
Use some common sense.
LonelyGhost said:what do you mean "finally"????
you been living in a monestary for a while? read some of VV or Julia's posts ...
Kev said:Wrong thats why the postal workers should have had guns.
She may have gotten one shot off but after that she would have been dead.
TOUCHE
Not common sense, just sorta sad. Trying to regulate such is not common sense either. Videogames? FOXNews.georgebushmoron said:This is common sense? In the world of video games, I suppose it is.
No AM thats whats wrong with to many today. They think that because someone has a gun in their possession that they will use it against someone solely on the basis that it is in their possession. And thats just not true. However criminals will, crazy people will, those who snap like this women at the post office will. None of these should be allowed guns of any kind and there should be laws that prohibit people of unsound mind against possessing them.American Male said:Follow this line of thinking to its conclusion. We should just give everyone a gun and that way, we can have an endless series of handgun shoot-outs on every street corner, in every bar and anyplace else people disagree with each other.
Police are to serve and protect. Their weapons are used defensively.georgebushmoron said:So let's say she has a semi-automatic, and she starts shooting when people aren't facing her. A semi-automatic will take out a 5 people before anyone can react. If she shoots from behind, even a non-automatic can take out quite a few.
Guns are an offensive weapon, not a defensive weapon. Use some common sense.
That should depend on you not law makers.Is everyone supposed to carry guns ever at the ready in case some nutcase suddenly starts firing?
yup ... only joking ... and if it was offensive then the mods can remove it. you can pm them and quote this message.American Male said:Please say you were only joking, LG!
georgebushmoron said:That should teach even the most pig headed out of you guys why guns should be banned.
georgebushmoron said:Guns are an offensive weapon, not a defensive weapon. Use some common sense.
So, your knee jerk reaction is to ban all guns because of a certain nut-case going on a shooting spree. Then is it fair to say that when a car thief steals a car and gets into a car accident injuring innocent people, we must ban all cars? I am not sure of the numbers at this moment but don't cars kill more people than guns?Kev said:Police are to serve and protect. Their weapons are used defensively.
Ok you don't now much about guns. She had a semi-automatic.......she used a 9 mm handgun. I've never heard of a 9mm that wasn't a semi-automatic. Maybe you meant to say automatic. Those are illegal in the USA, just like in Canada.
sexxxygirl said:So how about them Calgary Flames ! LOL![]()
![]()
I'd go postal over them anytime
![]()






