Failure = George W. Bush???

[ghostie]

I was reading on a website recently that if you google the word "failure", the first thing that comes up is the "Biography of President George W. Bush".

I tried it... and by God it works!! ... yep, that's right... the official one at www.whitehouse.gov

Is that kind of bizzare or what?

The second thing that comes up is kind of interesting too.

 

[Sigpig02]

now that is very interesting. well who knew that the google guys hated him

 

[dittman]

everybody knows that the hi tech money people are democrats, theyve got theirs and dont want any of the other riff raff to crowd them

 

[wildonion]

everybody knows th democrats, theyve got theirs and crowd them

Don't come out to the adult pool, you'll only hurt yourself trying to use that thing most of us call a brain.

 

[The Lizard King]

Dittman, there's a bigger spread between rich and poor, and a disappearing middle class, in the U.S. than ever before since the Republicans got back in. Your country is headed for financial doom as GWB's base and Cheney's buddies are making BILLIONS off of America's misfortune. I'm not so sure the Dems think or govern entirely the same way.

 

[Sigpig02]

Well LK I think your right on the money there ALL Politicians have only one thought in their heads and thats how too make money for them and their friends %$^k the little guy.

 

[The Lizard King]

Well LK I think your right on the money there ALL Politicians have only one thought in their heads and that’s how too make money for them and their friends %$^k the little guy.

True enough but some more so than others. Think of how many deals and commitments these guys, and gals, make to get their campaigns financed, votes, and to ultimately get elected. By the time they get into office they owe a lot of people and are generally connected to the business world or are lawyers etc to begin with. I wonder how many are actually Chuck Cadman like with respect to their motivation to get involved politically and their background as average folk?

 

[Sigpig02]

Going by recent history I would say none

 

[Herb_The_Perb]

everybody knows that the hi tech money people are democrats, theyve got theirs and dont want any of the other riff raff to crowd them

Possible explanations for this and all other dittperson posts:
A - Paranoid?
B - Delusiuonal?
C - Uninformed?
D - Misinformed?
E - Not the sharpest knife in the drawer?
F - Gets all info from Limbaugh and Fox?
G - All of the above?

 

[Sigpig02]

Hmmm I would think G is the safe answer

 

[ace85]

Google

Weapons of Mass Distruction, used to come up with a formulated internet error page that was quite funny.

If you do failure and the "i feel lucky buttom" it takes you to GWB.

I still am entertained by the fact that so much of the US appears to HATE GWB but he won 2 elections.

Lets play a game. It is called GWB and JFK. Lets talk similarities.

 

[lenharper]

Both came from political families.
Both are highly over-rated.
Both are brain dead.

 

[Herb_The_Perb]

I still am entertained by the fact that so much of the US appears to HATE GWB but he won 2 elections.

Didn't win.
Stole.

 

[smackyo]

i think charles barkley said it best with this quote "i know politics is corrupt. how is gwb gonna raise 4 hundred million dollars to run for a job that pays 400 000 a year?"

 

[ace85]

Herbie You are Smarter than that.

Didn't win.
Stole.

Was the election close, yes, did it reveal a ton of issues in voting process, yes.

There was a time for leadership from Al Gore, and he really missed the boat. He needed to conceed.

Counting Ballots that don't meet the physical criteria is a slippery slope. The democratic supreme court did rule on the event. Due process occured.


Hanging on to the "Florida election" as a crutch is week. GWB was validated by winning 4 years later. What are the Democrats excuse for that one. That might be the short sightedness that is hampering the Democratic leadership build support in the US

Also remember that the Kennedy's bought the Illinois electoral votes in a much more corrupt manner.

 

[ace85]

I would vote for Charles Barkley in a heart beat.

I think he would be a good president and an excellent solution to racial problems. He is unapologetic about ackowledging on going racial issues in a frank manner, and he also isn't afraid to remind African Americans that they need to fix some of their own problems.

Plus he is hilarious.

http://clintcam.com/barkley/

 

[HankQuinlan]

Didn't win.
Stole.

He did win the second one (unless you count more-underhanded-than-the- other-guy campaign techniques and massive advertising budgets as stealing).

The reason so many Americans hate George Bush so passionately is the extreme divide in opinion that has deepened so greatly under his presidency. I'm pissed at him and his handlers as a Canadian; if I was American I wouldn't be able to contain my wrath. I'd be writing so many letters to the editor that I would get on an enemies' list.

At a summer music festival the stage comments by performers like John Prine (and including Texans like Eliza Gilkyson) were likely to get them strip-searched on their way back home.

 

[ace85]

SO Many Americans

"So Many Americans"

That is a funny line. It is still only half.

And my bet is the republicans win the next election.

I think the "so many americans" hate him, becasue he is doing some difficult things.

Couple that with a left leaning media that is happy to sell papers and advetising by continuing to promote a "question the leadership" agenda. You have a combustible society. I don't think the media is anti Bush, just left leaning and of "create stories not report stories" mind set. They would be attacking the leadership no matter whom.

Others might care more about catering to that media.

The democrats are in a difficult spot, every one is aware that they don't like a lot of things, but they really struggle with identifying what they actually stand for.

They are actually is self created quicksand. A gregarious President like Clinton, who I think is a much better "ex president" than he was a president. Should have built momentum for the democrats. They just couldn't get out of their own way.

That being said. I truly believe that the radical left policies are more dangerous to a society than the radical right. Simply becasue once the permissive changes get made, it is difficult to undo those things.

Some of the radical right policies are just kept in check by human nature and common sense.

 

[HankQuinlan]

If even a third of Americans (and I believe they do) actually hate Bush and his policies, that is somewhere like 100 million Americans, and certainly qualifies as "so many..."

 

[lenharper]

Ace:

I thought we were gonna play a game about the similarites between bush and kennedy. I already posted what I thought was similar. awww c'mon...