Recently I saw a young lady and I would like to write about my experience, but I can't, at least I'm not supposed to. She asks that we not post (DNR) about experiences with her. It wasn't terrible; I wasn't scammed, but it wasn't very good either. And I can't share that with you. Doesn't this DNR policy just serve to shield mediocre or poor providers? I think it could be used by scammers, fraudsters to shield themselves from just criticism. Doesn't this defeat the purpose of this board? What do you think?
DNR - Is it a good idea?
- Thread starter bsgrinder
- Start date
PERB does not allow repeat offenders to maintain DNR status.
If you are a person who likes to review, maybe DNR ladies are not for you.
If you are a person who likes to review, maybe DNR ladies are not for you.
I suggest you PM a Mod, just because someone claims to be DNR doesn’t mean they are on the PERB DNR list.
I think this a bit of BS.
It would be different if you were just dating her and not paying for a service-then afterwards rated and described what happened on the date on a website for strangers to read about-that would be wrong on every level.
Think of it this way-if you had visited a RMT and had had a very bad experience, it would be in the public's best interest for you to review it. If the RMT had said please don't tell anyone about this bad massage-would or should you comply?
Same thing if you went to a Chiropractor and who was less than professional-he probably wouldn't want an honest negative review about his treatment either.
Bad service in all sectors of the economy has to face criticism (or praise if the service is really good.)
If an SP is continually giving bad service, or charging for an hour and then giving only 30 minutes or whatever it may be,then maybe she should get out of the business.
That's what this review website is all about.
It would be different if you were just dating her and not paying for a service-then afterwards rated and described what happened on the date on a website for strangers to read about-that would be wrong on every level.
Think of it this way-if you had visited a RMT and had had a very bad experience, it would be in the public's best interest for you to review it. If the RMT had said please don't tell anyone about this bad massage-would or should you comply?
Same thing if you went to a Chiropractor and who was less than professional-he probably wouldn't want an honest negative review about his treatment either.
Bad service in all sectors of the economy has to face criticism (or praise if the service is really good.)
If an SP is continually giving bad service, or charging for an hour and then giving only 30 minutes or whatever it may be,then maybe she should get out of the business.
That's what this review website is all about.
Scammers and fraudsters won't be protected by DNR.
If service was mediocre but you can't say it was delivered in bad faith, I'd be inclined to respect SP's wishes if they were expressed before booking. Even without a formal PERB status.
It should be in her ad, or at least told during booking before you were committed.
There are valid reasons for DNR, and it's good PERB is recognizing it. There are potential clients who don't rely on reviews, maybe that's the best match for DNR SPs. Instead of doubting SPs' motives, maybe it's better to ask: "does she prefer to lose a client because of the DNR status, or would she agree to see a negative review if things go wrong." Her DNR request kind of answers that question.
The potential clients can choose, take a risk of seeing somebody with no feedback option; or pick another SP. I see it similarly to accepting other restrictions SPs may mention in their ads.
I thought this thread was going to be about "Do Not Resuscitate" orders.
Could it be becasue I'm getting closer to that stage of my life. :shocked: LOL!
Could it be becasue I'm getting closer to that stage of my life. :shocked: LOL!
DNR is usually for discretion purposes. Not udually to hide bad behaviour or service. Over the years, people can give out a lot of information about sps. Whether it be about tattoos or body marks, incall info, all that info compiles and can threaten privacy. What if one of the perb people was collecting info to try and get an sp kicked out of a building? Or stalkers and such.
I don't find DNR to be much of an issue imo.
I don't find DNR to be much of an issue imo.
