One thing that really pisses me off is some special status for police being killed. That is a load of crap!!! Their life is no more valuable than anyone else's.
Yeah, a load of crap until some scumbag has a gun to your head and you're crying like a baby for the police to save your pathetic ass. So you don't value the lives of the people who put themselves in harms way, and that could also include firemen and even WWII vets as examples, to protect the public? Amazing...
i don't see how that impacts the argument about taxes and the death penalty one way or the other.
That particular part doesn't but you didn't answer the question.
but the best way to answer your question is that justice has to be impartial; i wouldn't want to live in a world where punishment is determined by victims; there'd be no justice, only revenge. and under no circumstances would I want to be the one throwing the switch... what would that make me?
I didn't suggest punishment be determined by victims so don't insinuate that. No justice? Are you suggesting that victims are only looking for revenge? Throwing the switch would make you a public servant. Some people choose to serve the public, others decide to do something else with their lives. Your choice would obviously not be to serve the public.
this is just ignorant and stupid. if you extend this dumb logic to everything, why should americans who opposed the war in iraq, for example, have to pay for it. they too should get tax exemptions. if i don't want a highway built, i can get a tax exemption for that too. it's absurd and exemplifies the problem with reducing everything to "i don't want to pay taxes" blah blah blah.
I'm talking about the death penalty so, again, you're attempting to twist what I post to meet your argument. Why don't you start a "sponsor the scumbag" program? That way people such as yourself, who don't believe in the death penalty or want to "forgive" these parasites, can actually finance them for the rest of their lives. I do want to pay taxes, and very well may pay more than you do, but I draw the line at keeping these people alive.
incidentally, lizard king's eagerness to be the executioner speaks volumes
Sure does. I could put a gun to the head of Clifford Olsen or Paul Bernardo, pull the trigger, immediately go out for a nice dinner and return home and sleep like a baby. I'm okay with that and can understand the fact that others wouldn't be. On the other hand, if I was driving down the highway and hit a deer and killed it, I would feel like shit.
It's not even about revenge, it's about these parasites losing the privilege to live and making sure there's absolutely no way the can re-offend, while saving the cost of keeping people alive who clearly do not deserve to be.
They are people who were on death row but lucky for them they found out they were not guilty before they were murdered by the state. For all those that say, so what if a few fall through the cracks, all I say to you is "be my guest you go first" The death penalty is not a deterrent, and worst of all is non reversible when they get things wrong.
Which is why I reserve my opinion to only instances when the evidence is irrefutable and DNA based. A Kelly Ellard, say, would not be sent to the death, while a Paul Bernardo would be.
Whether it's a deterrent is not the issue. I don't care. If I was Boss50 I could use the twisted logic example of speeding. Losing your license for excessive speeding tickets obviously is not a deterrent to some people, just drive around Vancouver and the surrounding area, so why even bother suspending licenses?