A Heads up on Eros Guide

[Adriana✿]

OH. MY. GOD.

I've had an on ad on eros for 3 or 4 years on and off. Sames pictures, same text. No changes.

A few days ago I replied to an e-mail they sent and in my signature it is written that i provide GFE, msog.

They took my ad down because they said they saw I provide illegal activities according to the their laws(U.S.ofA) . (even though you can pay $20 extra to be in their GFE section on their website!.)

So I had to completely start from scratch with NEW TEXT and NEW PICTURES! OMG. And now i am never allowed to use the original pictures or text ever again, on their site, as I have been flagged for providing illegal activities.

And don't even get me started on what they said about my e-mail address with sixnine in it.

Just a heads up that using a banner, text, pictures that even HINT you may have a pussy, or ANYTHING in an e-mail that suggests you are anything other than an "escort" for companionship purposes only, will make your interaction with Eros extremely difficult.

I am very glad to be a Canadian

 

[trackstar]

I'll bet it's okay to put machine guns in your ad and claim that you've killed 16 Iraqis for the cause though

 

[Lady Companion]

Paypal and photos

US laws changed a coupe of years ago which included no genital touching, percieved genital touching, or nudity of genitals. It sounds as though yours just slipped through the cracks, and they are just getting ontop of the new regulations now.

More recenlty, they have also restricted the use of words like 'courtesan' and acronyms potentially indicating sexual services. My ad has been in their Vancouver escorts section for years, with the same tagline - and that was revised about six months ago.

As for paypal, there is a clause in their contracts which does make stipulation for potential adult content if you have their prior approval. I assume eros jumped through the hoops to utilize that. I don't think the modifications to eros have been a result of paypal reqeusts though. I think they are such big players that they are just very contientious about staying on the white side of gray in revised US legal matters.