9/11 Mysteries - A Look At The Controlled Demolition Of The World Trade Center

Status
Not open for further replies.

Goldenrod

Banned
Jul 1, 2008
114
0
0
I don't know why everyone is acting so shocked and horrified that this could have been an inside job.

This is George Bush, Dick Cheney, Halliburton, the USA and big business we're talking about.

No one will ever be able to prove one way or another what happened on Sept 11th but is it SO terrible to question and ask for answers?
 

trackstar

Swollen Member
Jun 26, 2004
2,505
17
38
fine.. but this is all hear so, no? (regardless I dont know much about the FED RES):confused:

As far as I'm concerned what haappened was planned, set up, and executed by a higher power that is NOT the taliban.

There is not a doubt in my mind, that the CIA, GOV, FEDS etc control more that we could even fathom..and yet we think we have freedom HA!:mad:
You're missing my point. The federal reserve owns and controls all of the money in the US. The money controls the players (US government, CIA, Etc). You're making my point without understanding why. The WTC was an inside job, caused by the same people as the ones that made sure the US entered WWII and Vietnam. Look up the history of the federal reserve and a lot of what goes on will make a lot more sense to you.
 

sonoman

Leg man.
May 14, 2005
1,830
4
0
Vancouver
Anybody who still belives that 9/11 conspiracy is just another "conspiracy theory" and not an inside job fall into one of these categories:

1) Complete idiot who only belives what he's fed by the mainstream media. Couch potato with partially paralized brain.

Wake up and take advantage of internet, and educate yourself a little about what's really going on in this world.
Yes, of course, because the internet contains only true and accurate information... :rolleyes: Believe everything you read? What worries me is the extent to which youtube, Google, etc. are increasingly being accepted as 'academic' research sources, even by university kids.
 

trackstar

Swollen Member
Jun 26, 2004
2,505
17
38
If I did not know better I would think that you were an authority on the subject. We can have our conspiracy theories. But people who make claims as if they are fact simply appear to be delusional.
I'm not delusional at all. GOD tells me things. Yes GP, he even told me about you and your "Experimenting" days with your gay neighbour when he was feeding you X. Did you really let him stick a... :eek: Oops, sorry GOD, I know I said I would keep it to myself. GOD says he forgives you GP. :D
 

Chet

Banned
Mar 13, 2006
31
1
0
The buildings collapsed from the top down after the sections that the planes hit . If the explosives were in the bottom it would have fallen over. So explain that? Some ppl. need to spend some time watching mining operations to understand explosives and how they work.
I can't believe how simple minded some people are. You obviously have no idea about demolition process what so ever. Go watch some of demolition footages and see if you can find one footage of modern demolition work with explosives planted and blown only in the bottom of the building.

Plus, watch again the the footage of twin tower collapse and time it with your watch.
They collapsed in FREE FALL speed. Completely impossible unless the main structure of the buildings were blown out already or at the same time.

And Tower 7... It wasn't hit by a plane, not even hit by a single debris from the twin towers. And yet it collapsed in exact same manner.
Ask your logic and common sense.
 

trackstar

Swollen Member
Jun 26, 2004
2,505
17
38
I can't believe how simple minded some people are. You obviously have no idea about demolition process what so ever. Go watch some of demolition footages and see if you can find one footage of modern demolition work with explosives planted and blown only in the bottom of the building.

Plus, watch again the the footage of twin tower collapse and time it with your watch.
They collapsed in FREE FALL speed. Completely impossible unless the main structure of the buildings were blown out already or at the same time.

And Tower 7... It wasn't hit by a plane, not even hit by a single debris from the twin towers. And yet it collapsed in exact same manner.
Ask your logic and common sense.
Just for the record GP, GOD confirms what Chet just said. He is right :D
 

Chet

Banned
Mar 13, 2006
31
1
0
Yes, of course, because the internet contains only true and accurate information... :rolleyes: Believe everything you read? What worries me is the extent to which youtube, Google, etc. are increasingly being accepted as 'academic' research sources, even by university kids.
I obviously don't believe everything I'm fed by media and internet. Otherwise I wouldn't dare to say this is another classic conspiracy? To you commercial broadcasts like FOX and CBC might be the only academic resource to trust.
See for yourself and make judgements and allegations based on facts and evidences.
There's enough significant reasons for even university kids to think that they are valid claims. Get your lazy fingers rolling and do the research yourself before you believe and see if they're claims without proof.

Try to answer some of the very obvious questions and allegations first.
See if you can... and if you can't you should be wondering why. Simple enough?
Likes of you wouldn't believe anything unless they see it on the front page of newspaper. That's what I call couch potatoes with partially paralized brain. Only willing to live on what he's accustomed to and being fed.
 
Last edited:

Goldenrod

Banned
Jul 1, 2008
114
0
0
Believe everything you read?
Do you?

And if so why should the mainstream news/papers (which I assume you watch/listen to/read) be right and the conspiracy theorists be wrong?

Would you really be that shocked it if were proven to be an inside job? Really?
 

Chet

Banned
Mar 13, 2006
31
1
0
not quite "Nuff"
Here's a review of the article you posted. If you're willing to read.

"This article has a page of Editor's Notes, "The Lies Are Out There," written by James Meigs, whose previous columns have praised military technology (such as the UAVs used in Fallujah). Meigs places outside of society anyone who questions the official version of events of 9/11/01: "

And it goes on in the following:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/
 
Last edited:

Chet

Banned
Mar 13, 2006
31
1
0
And here's another interesting opinion about that Popular Mechanics website and the author of the article:

......
Chertoff's Cousin Penned Popular Mechanics 9/11 Hit Piece

Chistopher Bollyn for American Free Press | March 7 2005

Dictators like Saddam Hussein have always used nepotism to protect their secrets and maintain control. Like a dictatorship, the inner cabal that directs the actions of the Bush administration uses the same tactics to confuse the public and conceal the truth of 9/11.

Dictators have always employed nepotism, the placing of family members in key positions, for one simple reason: only loyal family members can be trusted with the secrets that keep them in power. For this reason the shameless nepotism of the Bush administration should alarm Americans because it indicates that a dictatorship is encroaching upon the United States.

The Defense Department defines nepotism as the situation when relatives are in the same chain-of-command.

An egregious example of dictatorial-style nepotism occurred when George W. Bush won the White House ? twice ? thanks to the key "swing state" of Florida, where the presidential candidate's younger brother is governor. In 2000 and 2004, against all odds, Florida swung decisively, the Bush way.

With high federal offices being given to the wives, sons and daughters of senior members of the Bush administration, the Hearst Corporation executives that publish Popular Mechanics magazine probably didn't worry about the ethical considerations of hiring a cousin of Michael Chertoff, a former Assistant Attorney General and the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as senior researcher.

But the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics (PM) plumbs new depths of nepotism and Hearst-style "yellow journalism" with its cover story about 9/11. PM's senior researcher, 25-year-old Benjamin Chertoff, authored a propagandistic cover story entitled "Debunking 9/11 Lies" which seeks to discredit all independent 9/11 research that challenges the official version of events.

"Conspiracy theories can't stand up to the hard facts," the cover reads. "After an in-depth investigation, PM answers with the truth," it says. But the article fails to provide evidence to support its claims and doesn't answer the key question: What caused the collapses of the twin towers and the 47-story World Trade Center 7?

The Chertoff article goes on to confront the "poisonous claims" of 16 "myths" spun by "extremist" 9/11 researchers like myself with "irrefutable facts," mostly provided by individuals in the employ of the U.S. government.

But who is Benjamin Chertoff, the "senior researcher" at Popular Mechanics who is behind the article? American Free Press has learned that he is none other than a cousin of Michael Chertoff, the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

This means that Hearst paid Benjamin Chertoff to write an article supporting the seriously flawed explanation that is based on a practically non-existent investigation of the terror event that directly led to the creation of the massive national security department his "cousin" now heads. This is exactly the kind of "journalism" one would expect to find in a dictatorship like that of Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Because the manager of public relations for Popular Mechanics didn't respond to repeated calls from American Free Press, I called Benjamin Chertoff, the magazine's "senior researcher," directly.

Chertoff said he was the "senior researcher" of the piece. When asked if he was related to Michael Chertoff, he said, "I don't know." Clearly uncomfortable about discussing the matter further, he told me that all questions about the article should be put to the publicist ? the one who never answers the phone.

Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, "Yes, of course, he is a cousin."
 
Last edited:

zaig

Active member
Nov 21, 2003
274
24
28
Here is something to think about.

2 reporters from the Washington Post reported on a simple breakin at the Watergate in 1972. They went on to win a Pulitzer Prize, bring down a president, have a movie made about this, and had every other new organization in the US follow their story after it was proved to be true..

The government couldn't keep this small breakin covered up, HOW THE HELL DOES ANYONE THINK THAT IF IN FACT THIS WAS A CONSPIRACY, THAT THESE CONSPIRATORS COULD KEEP THIS QUIET FOR THIS LONG.

I could be wrong, but I think that there are still ambitious reporters out there who would love to get indisputable facts that this was a conspiracy, but up until now I have not seen anything that qualifies.

Give your head a shake.

If you watched the CBC a couple of weeks ago, they had a documentary about this exact subject, and while there were countless mistakes made by the authorities, and that there are still certain unexplained annomilies, the plain facts are that 2 of the 4 hijacked planes flew into the WTC Towers.
They also showed how and why building 7 came down. I would venture to say that most of these conspiracy theorists never saw the backside of Building 7 on fire, windows blowing out and slowly crumbling. Anyone who has seen the Silverstein interview knows that it wasn't his decision to PULL the building. As a matter of fact it came down by itself.

I enjoy a good conspiracy theory as much as the next, but there are way too many people with way too much time on their hands trying to implicate the authorities.

I suppose the bombings in London and Madrid by Al-Queda were also a conspiracy.

GIVE YOUR HEAD A SHAKE.

Now everyone should go back to what this board is supposed to be and that is an Escort Review Board.

Questioning is good, but questioning for the sake of listening to yourself, well that's just silly.
 

bcneil

I am from BC
Aug 24, 2007
2,095
0
36
I obviously don't believe everything I'm fed by media and internet.
Yet all your posts on this subject are either name calling.
Or things you have cut and paste directly from the.....internet....

How Ironic.
 

wilecoyote

Member
Jul 20, 2007
38
2
8
I love how conspiracy theorists have the luxury of throwing out random statements and presenting them as facts. How ignorant these people are. Talk to anybody that was there ... I have, and the stories are incredible. You have to be an utter and complete moron to believe that this was a controlled demolition. You'd also have to know absolutely nothing about the demolition process.

Speaking of morons ... the guy above who said that Tower 7 collapsed even though it was untouched ... would be an interesting statement if it were in any way true. But Tower 7 was severely damaged when part of the first tower that came down fell on it. But hey, why include that small detail? Doesn't fit well with the crazy star-chamber conspiracy theories.
 

Goldenrod

Banned
Jul 1, 2008
114
0
0
I love how conspiracy theorists have the luxury of throwing out random statements and presenting them as facts. How ignorant these people are. Talk to anybody that was there ... I have, and the stories are incredible. You have to be an utter and complete moron to believe that this was a controlled demolition. You'd also have to know absolutely nothing about the demolition process.

Speaking of morons ... the guy above who said that Tower 7 collapsed even though it was untouched ... would be an interesting statement if it were in any way true. But Tower 7 was severely damaged when part of the first tower that came down fell on it. But hey, why include that small detail? Doesn't fit well with the crazy star-chamber conspiracy theories.
Dude, just watch it.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598

And understand why there MIGHT, just might be questions before you mud sling.
 

trackstar

Swollen Member
Jun 26, 2004
2,505
17
38
And who says it's an inside job?

I already told you, GOD said so!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vancouver Escorts