Search results

yes she's also at boa nanaimo her breasts are like a golf ball in a tube sock, and her butt is about as saggy good bbj thou

Nothing to do with the tax payers Really What this country needs to do is quit subsidizibg people and busnessies and let the chips fall where they will. Instead of catering to every public sector whim Get back to the office Or take less pay

are you willing to work for less $ to stay home public sector get your ass in the office

If i,ve gone to spa and the massage is lame ,i ask to massge her , never have been turned down. This generally loosens her up

D Id vancouvers kane fo the same thing Post pics of him in washington

You sound like your never going to get old Good luck Remember no one gets out alive

i kind of disagree with the life savings part why should the tax payer pay so your family can have an inheritance

can anyone provide some information on this establishment please thanks

great speech but now time for some action don't lament to long

anyone try?

on your 7th request the liberal's did bring in maid the 5th cause of death in canada

I'll agree, very nice lady appreciated me running the gauntlet of picketers

I seen a sp a number of months ago she looked fairly fine in clothes but once removed oh my god woman something is wrong with you her breasts where like 2 golf balls in side a tube sock and her bum sagged incredibly supposedly 31 years old i would say she was not a drug user but I thought there...

i seen emmy at boa the other day 43 years very cute short blonde hair ,very firm sporty body the lfk and out side digits only kind of turned off a gfe experience but a very nice girl

Omar the tent maker

maybe you proved their point ,,, can they spell she/her, they /them

the 6 comments above me your rhetoric is exactly why trump won ... their feed up with the looney left like you 6 are spouting maga won maga won maga won and if you don't see the same thing happening in Canada get your collective heads out of the trees

sounds about right ,,, trudeau is the enemy of canada

I keep reading your rebuttle ,,but just don,t get it

Please expand on objective facts ,,please