Massage Adagio

2019 Election thread

YGpoon

Active member
Jul 4, 2017
153
70
28
Live updates:

Scheer: "My vision for Canada is everyone getting ahead"
Moderator: "And what does that mean exactly?"
Scheer: "It means people will get ahead"
Moderator: "But, how exactly?"
Scheer: "Through my vision"
Moderator: "Details?"
Scheer: "They'll be better off"
This is why I hate politics.....Seen a bit of Andrew Yang in the USA election, he's someone that looks/sounds promising. He at least answers questions and seems to want to make USA better...everyone else just wants to "win"
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
I did vote for Trudeau last time, against my better judgement, based entirely on his promise of eliminating First Past The Post. That was probably the most blatantly deceitful promise any politician has ever made. He never had any intention of honestly changing a system that got him elected.
Tell me about it. The moment they won they forgot how they won: with NDP and Green support because of that promise. They had their heads up their own asses and decided that it was all their own charisma.

What's worse was that they dismissed the electoral reform idea based on the outcome of a survey that was clearly engineered not to draw any coherent conclusions. I took the survey and with every question I just became more demoralised. It was pretty obvious they were trying to kill it.

Bet hey who needs a fair and honest system of government when you've got legal pot? (Sarcasm)

For some reason Peter Mansbridge's parting words on election night stuck with me and haunt me: "the last unfair election" (spoken in a dubious tone). We all knew it was bullshit.
 

Jethro Bodine

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2009
4,459
1,892
113
Beverly Hills. In the Kitchen eatin' vittles.
The viewpoint of the people that attended the party where Trudeau wore brownface:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-brownface-photo-trudeau-west-point-grey-1.5290814

These comments are especially telling:

"I don't recall anybody saying anything negative about it. I don't think the intention was to hurt anybody," said Khurana.

Other parents who attended the event told CBC they weren't offended by Trudeau's get-up, and see the scandal as a distraction from the real issues.

The school's director of communications, Megan MacMillan, said the concerns raised about the photos of Trudeau "align with our own values and commitment to inclusion and equality.""Our 2001 gala event was organized by a culturally diverse group of parent volunteers and was intended to be celebratory and respectful. That said, we recognize cultural sensitivities have evolved over the past 18 years,".

JD
First of all who really gives a flying fuck what these people think. They’re a bunch of entitled white people. Do you really think they have any real perspective on this?
Secondly comments like this show racism is alive and well in Canada. For them to think there is nothing wrong with his costume or that this is somehow distracting from the “real issues” speaks for itself.
These fucking people have no clue!
 

overdone

Banned
Apr 26, 2007
1,826
442
83
Probably because JT had the decency and balls to get out and apologize right away.
lol, if any of that was even remotely close to being true

he would have revealed it when he ran for the Liberal Leadership

he got caught, outed, plain and simple

he's a lying hypocrite, he has no decency, if he did, at the very least, he'd say he was going to stop calling everyone who disagrees with him a Nazi, if he had any, he's already said he won't

you're just like the Republicans in the states, you'll say anything to defend the indefensible

it's just getting sadder by the day, the grope, Aga Khan, SNC, Obstructing the RCMP, India trip

he's simply not a leader, he's a lying Sack of Shit, just like Trump, thinks laws don't apply to him, incompetent, plain and simple

there is no defending him

if he had decency and balls

he would have already gone away

his arrogance and ego won't let him
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
First of all who really gives a flying fuck what these people think. They’re a bunch of entitled white people. Do you really think they have any real perspective on this?
Secondly comments like this show racism is alive and well in Canada. For them to think there is nothing wrong with his costume or that this is somehow distracting from the “real issues” speaks for itself.
These fucking people have no clue!
Really...Khurana is an entitled white person ?????
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
Tell me about it. The moment they won they forgot how they won: with NDP and Green support because of that promise. They had their heads up their own asses and decided that it was all their own charisma.

What's worse was that they dismissed the electoral reform idea based on the outcome of a survey that was clearly engineered not to draw any coherent conclusions. I took the survey and with every question I just became more demoralised. It was pretty obvious they were trying to kill it.

Bet hey who needs a fair and honest system of government when you've got legal pot? (Sarcasm)

For some reason Peter Mansbridge's parting words on election night stuck with me and haunt me: "the last unfair election" (spoken in a dubious tone). We all knew it was bullshit.
I call bullshit on the idea that first past the post is unfair electorally.Every Canadian that is eligible to vote can vote.They vote for the candidate/party of their respective choice.They system is set up that ballot box stuffing is hard to do.After the polls
close the votes are tallied and in each riding the candidate with the most votes wins the seat.What can be fairer than that?

Ah but then you have the NDP/Greens who push for and want Proportional Representation.If the NDP got 18% of the vote they would get 18% of the seats in Parliament.Same with is the Greens got 12% of the vote they would get 12% of the seats
in Parliament.Yet in both instances for the NDP/Greens and most especially for the Greens they would not have actually gotten enough ballots in the majority of those ridings to actually WIN those ridings.

At the same time if Proportional Representation was enacted how on earth do you actually get the Constituents of say a seat in Parliament in Alberta arbitrarily awarded to a Green MP when that Green MP wants to shut down the oil & gas industry to be in any way happy about it.They are not going to be happy they are going to be open to revolt.

Proportional Representation is nothing but participation trophy politics.It empowers the fringe parties who have no honest real chance of winning any serious amount of representation.

If the Green party got 10% of the vote and then gets 33 seats in Parliament handed to them when they maybe might have won between 2-3 seats by actual ballot counts in ridings from coast to coast that is just utterly FUCKED.It is ignoring the will of the electorate.

Take a look at Europe to see how well Proportional Representation has worked......it is nothing but a fucking joke.

Go back to when that pussy wimp Stephan Dion along with Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe tried to hijack government with an attempt of a coalition government and the refrain from Canadians was resounding in that the response was "I did not vote for those assholes!" and it was a very loud reaction to say the least.

SR
 

chitown

Active member
Jul 3, 2014
257
97
43
Every voting system has it's flaws. FPtP definitely does, but PR is hardly the miracle cure. Look at, for instance, Spain. They've called for their 4th election in the past four years, because no single party has been able to hold a majority. Due to PR lots of minor parties obtained seats, and while in theory this sounds good with lots of different voices being heard, in practice this means the government is dysfunctional. No one can hold a governing coalition together because not enough of the different parties can agree long enough to get things done. The result is just election after election until someone hopefully gets enough seats.
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
I call bullshit on the idea that first past the post is unfair electorally.Every Canadian that is eligible to vote can vote.They vote for the candidate/party of their respective choice.They system is set up that ballot box stuffing is hard to do.After the polls
close the votes are tallied and in each riding the candidate with the most votes wins the seat.What can be fairer than that?

Ah but then you have the NDP/Greens who push for and want Proportional Representation.If the NDP got 18% of the vote they would get 18% of the seats in Parliament.Same with is the Greens got 12% of the vote they would get 12% of the seats
in Parliament.Yet in both instances for the NDP/Greens and most especially for the Greens they would not have actually gotten enough ballots in the majority of those ridings to actually WIN those ridings.

At the same time if Proportional Representation was enacted how on earth do you actually get the Constituents of say a seat in Parliament in Alberta arbitrarily awarded to a Green MP when that Green MP wants to shut down the oil & gas industry to be in any way happy about it.They are not going to be happy they are going to be open to revolt.

Proportional Representation is nothing but participation trophy politics.It empowers the fringe parties who have no honest real chance of winning any serious amount of representation.

If the Green party got 10% of the vote and then gets 33 seats in Parliament handed to them when they maybe might have won between 2-3 seats by actual ballot counts in ridings from coast to coast that is just utterly FUCKED.It is ignoring the will of the electorate.

Take a look at Europe to see how well Proportional Representation has worked......it is nothing but a fucking joke.

Go back to when that pussy wimp Stephan Dion along with Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe tried to hijack government with an attempt of a coalition government and the refrain from Canadians was resounding in that the response was "I did not vote for those assholes!" and it was a very loud reaction to say the least.

SR
You know we've had this conversation before right?

The short rebuttal for anyone that cares: "we did not vote for those assholes" is exactly the response the majority of Canadians had to the last several Harper governments, because they got majority control (eventually) with a minority of the votes.

It comes down to whether you value regional representation more (which you do) or a balance of ideologies in the government that are reflective of the balance of ideologies of the electorate as a whole, regardless of geography (which I do). The Harper government (and to be fair they were not unique in this) proved that regional representation didn't mean shit. You voted on party lines, not the interests of your constituents.

FPtP is basically our version of the electoral college.
 

Robert Upndown

You can call me Bob
Sep 23, 2011
1,006
374
83
Better the Devil you know, than the Devil you don't!
 

Hugh Jass

Banned
May 11, 2015
306
1
16
Better the Devil you know, than the Devil you don't!
There's an exception to every rule. This is one of them. Not because of his blackface incidents, thats just one in a long list of transgressions and hypocrisies but his management of the economy during good times (largely due to a strong US economy) has been a disaster.

While people like to compare Scheer to Doug Ford, Justin is following the Kathleen Wynne philosophy spending money like a drunken sailor (hey Trevor Noah, here's 50 million just because and hey lets buy that pipeline with taxpayers money for 4.5 billion so we cant use it)...and we saw what happened to her and the Ontario Liberals. This should and I believe will have more of an impact on the election than his "blackface" during the current campaign.

You can see what his budgetary promises were in this article and how he absolutely failed to even try to deliver, just like every other promise he made, except on weed and he even screwed that up. This is from a news outlet that loves Trudeau and usually defends him vigorously.

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-government-posts-third-straight-150113993.html
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
And to further "distract" from the face painting theatrics, Trudeau announces a soon to be sweeping firearms ban - first banning all semi-automatics, then handguns, and pretty soon everything else.

Yep, I'll admit I didn't really give a shit about the face painting other than shaking my head and wondering how badly JT wants to tank the party due to his own ego and narcissism, but this will be the last straw for me. Fuck it, I'm going to literally hold my nose and vote for that wankstain Scheer. The gall of saying taking guns away from the most vetted citizens in the country will stop gangs from shooting people is idiotic plain and simple, and proves that idiots really do hold way too much power in this country.
You nailed it dead center.The assault rifle ban and discretionary handgun ban was the Lieberals attempting to "change the channel" because the Lieberal friendly media could not get away with doing it for them.

Obtaining a non restricted firearm PAL in Canada is not easy.You have to take a firearms course which includes a written test as well as a range test.You have to pass a background check which includes the RCMP contacting your current spouse as well as any ex spouse not to mention mental fitness etc.For a restricted firearm PAL to own handguns it is even more onerous and carries with it a shitload of conditions.First off you have to be a member of a range.If you want to transport a handgun you have to give LE notice/ask permission.At any time LE wishes they can knock on your door and DEMAND to inspect the storage of your restricted hand guns with regards to storage/gun safety.I wont even go into the Prohibited firearm classification as that is another kettle of fish.I do know a guy who legally owns an Uzi though it does not really matter as he sold the magazines to it so it is essentially a cool paper weight but it must still be locked up in a gun safe.All law abiding gun owners in Canada willingly do this as firearms in Canada are not a right but a privilege unlike in the USA.

Gang members/criminals etc do not apply for a gun license.They buy guns illegally on the black market and use them to commit crimes.They do not take safe storage into consideration as law requires.

I remember when the Lieberals brought in the Long Gun Registry and said it would cost 2 MILLION to implement.It cost 2 BILLION and all it did was make law abiding gun owners into criminals if they did not register their long guns such as a rifle for taking down a deer/moose/caribou etc as well as shotguns used for water fowl and upland birds such as ducks/geese/grouse/ptarmigan/partridge etc.

The intent was to Change the channel on the brownface scandal and it is a pretty sleazy way to do it.

I will say though that through this "brown face" scandal it has completely removed the racial identity slant to this election.The Lieberals sure as hell will not be screaming identity politics at the Conservatives anytime as that is like pulling the pin on a grenade and
then shoving that grenade down your pants.

SR
 

masterblaster

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
1,983
1,219
113
You nailed it dead center.The assault rifle ban and discretionary handgun ban was the Lieberals attempting to "change the channel" because the Lieberal friendly media could not get away with doing it for them.

Obtaining a non restricted firearm PAL in Canada is not easy.You have to take a firearms course which includes a written test as well as a range test.You have to pass a background check which includes the RCMP contacting your current spouse as well as any ex spouse not to mention mental fitness etc.For a restricted firearm PAL to own handguns it is even more onerous and carries with it a shitload of conditions.First off you have to be a member of a range.If you want to transport a handgun you have to give LE notice/ask permission.At any time LE wishes they can knock on your door and DEMAND to inspect the storage of your restricted hand guns with regards to storage/gun safety.I wont even go into the Prohibited firearm classification as that is another kettle of fish.I do know a guy who legally owns an Uzi though it does not really matter as he sold the magazines to it so it is essentially a cool paper weight but it must still be locked up in a gun safe.All law abiding gun owners in Canada willingly do this as firearms in Canada are not a right but a privilege unlike in the USA.

Gang members/criminals etc do not apply for a gun license.They buy guns illegally on the black market and use them to commit crimes.They do not take safe storage into consideration as law requires.

I remember when the Lieberals brought in the Long Gun Registry and said it would cost 2 MILLION to implement.It cost 2 BILLION and all it did was make law abiding gun owners into criminals if they did not register their long guns such as a rifle for taking down a deer/moose/caribou etc as well as shotguns used for water fowl and upland birds such as ducks/geese/grouse/ptarmigan/partridge etc.

The intent was to Change the channel on the brownface scandal and it is a pretty sleazy way to do it.

I will say though that through this "brown face" scandal it has completely removed the racial identity slant to this election.The Lieberals sure as hell will not be screaming identity politics at the Conservatives anytime as that is like pulling the pin on a grenade and
then shoving that grenade down your pants.

SR
I have a non-restricted PAL and didn’t have to do any of that stuff. Gave me one when my possession only licence expired.
 
Last edited:

Humour

Banned
Sep 14, 2019
40
0
0
It comes down to whether you value regional representation more (which you do) or a balance of ideologies in the government that are reflective of the balance of ideologies of the electorate as a whole, regardless of geography (which I do.
The last thing I want is more minority governments and for “the balance of ideologies” to hold even more power. Andrew Weaver should be a non-entity but he lucked into a situation where his fringe party has influence far beyond support. Proportional representation will simply increase the chances of that happening again.
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
The last thing I want is more minority governments and for “the balance of ideologies” to hold even more power. Andrew Weaver should be a non-entity but he lucked into a situation where his fringe party has influence far beyond support. Proportional representation will simply increase the chances of that happening again.
That position is on the Provincial Scale....and it is bad enough....consider it on a National Scale and it leads to Destination Fucked.....a fringe party like the Greens extracting National Proportional Representation so as to prop up a Lieberal Minority Government into power that FUCKS the Country as a whole.

SR
 

sensualsixty

Active member
Nov 26, 2007
444
188
43
I have been around for an awful lot of elections - starting in 1958. I cannot remember being more disenchanted with the process than I am this time around. Much of the problem relates to the fact that we have too many party "leaders" without the necessary leadership skills. They all seem to be very busy trying to bribe us with our own money - even the ill-conceived gun control???? measures will cost big bucks.

Is there any chance that we can find enough local candidates with integrity and ability to send to Ottawa who would be able to clean out our so-called leaders?
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
The last thing I want is more minority governments and for “the balance of ideologies” to hold even more power. Andrew Weaver should be a non-entity but he lucked into a situation where his fringe party has influence far beyond support. Proportional representation will simply increase the chances of that happening again.
Why? As it stands FPtP means that more than half the population at any given time does not agree with the chosen government.

If 10% of the population agrees with a party, that's not fringe.

As far as I can tell the strongest opponents to proportional representation oppose it because they don't want to lose the advantage that disproportionately amplifies their power. (Both Harper and Trudeau are equally guilty of that.) They would have to acknowledge and share power with a growing contingent (not fringe) of Canadians that may not think like they do. Typically 60% of Canadians are not represented by the government in power, whichever way it goes. But cooperation seems to be a lost art.

FPtP gives you a fake Liberal majority as easily as it gives you a fake Conservative majority.

You and Storm Rider ok with another fake-majority Liberal government (or fake-majority Conservative government, whichever it is you least want)?
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,344
1,267
113
Victoria
If all ridings voted for the independant, then you might get things done for people and the country....

until then, the different parties will use your own tax dollars to bribe you... at getting a 2% tax refund for the 10% tax increase you will vote them in for.....
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
Proportional representation....Israel...two elections in the past six months with the chance of a third looming since nobody seems to be able to get their shit together....no thanks.
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
Proportional representation....Israel...two elections in the past six months with the chance of a third looming since nobody seems to be able to get their shit together....no thanks.
Nice to know that even when people are forced to cooperate they still don't.
 

overdone

Banned
Apr 26, 2007
1,826
442
83
If 10% of the population agrees with a party, that's not fringe.
so you think that if we keep letting in those who are Islamists, Sharia Law wannabes, who will eventually possibly make up 10% of the pop, they wouldn't be fringe?

how about the Greens now, May is basically saying we need to shutdown our economy, because you'd have to be delusional to think that we can actually do what she's saying

no oil, gas, propane, plastics, air flight, ect.....

if that isn't fringe what is?

don't care if they get 10%

they're still fringe

the Nazi Party, gets 10%, you wouldn't call them fringe? lol

fringe isn't a percentage, it's a ideology

stupid ideologies
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts