no, you've got it right. but even if he had left cbc quietly, his accusers (not cbc by the way) would have kept digging in order to make it public. so he pre-empted their story. like i said, now THEY (his accusers) have to disprove his stance that the rough sex was consentual. now he can sit back and say, 'yeah? prove it... in court'
The accusers were Jesse Brown (he has a podcast called "Canadaland") and the Toronto Star newspaper.
The main vehicle would be the Toronto Star as it has legal advisers and the cash to push the JG story forward.
On October 30 the Toronto cops said there wasn't an investigation but today (October 31) it looks like a couple of the women came forward and an investigation is going ahead.
From a twitter posting it looks like JG may have video-taped his ... activities and one of his accusers may have taken one of his tapes ...
It looks like JG ran a video for the CBC executives on October 23 (Thursday) night ... "sometimes there is bruising ???" ....
It also looks like the Q management (not the current team but the prior bunch) may have known of JG's inclinations but sort of brushed it aside as JG and the Q Program were getting more and more popular.
It was an easy call for the CBC Executives who fired JG ...
If you look at the pics of JG .... it he smary or smarmy or both ... ???
Your Q Host is a beating up fans, staff and guests ???
Did your producers know of JG ... hobby and ignored it ???
Is the CBC open to a legal challenge from victims ???