What is a "10" ?

[CLUB78]

I fail to see the value of a rating system that has no quantifiable measurements by which to determine superior or inferior attributes.

There needs to be some sort of point system for each attractive quality which should be further subdivided into categories. A BBW fan is certain to have a different opinion of what is an attractive breast than a man who likes skinny minnies and likewise with asses.


I submit that the first step in creating a fair and unbiased (hence accurate) rating system is the creation of categories which can be agreed are subjectively attractive. S=skinny B=bbw C=curvy H=hardbody

These should be further subdivided into Y=young M=middlins(30-50) and E=experienced(over 50).


Each body part that is rate-worthy would be represented by the following: Br=Breasts, Lg=legs, As=ass, Lp=lips,E=eyes,F=feet,V=vagina,Gf=general facial appearance,Gb=general body appearance.


i.e. A rating for a 25 year old thin woman with great boobs and nice legs may be tabulated as follows:

Under the Y /S category:

Br=9,Lg=8, As=7, Lp=7, E=6, F=9, V=5, Gf=7, Gb=8

The average rating for this young lady would work out to a respectable 7 and ¾


At the moment this system may still seem clumsy and inaccurate, but at least it’s a start. I appreciate any advice you may have on how to further develop this new rating system.


When objectifying women, we must objectify objectively. Men deserve accurate information. :thumb:


ROTFL...This whole thing was meant as a satirical criticism of the 1-10 rating system. Brilliant responses

 

[VanessaofBC]

I fail to see the value of a rating system that has no quantifiable measurements by which to determine superior or inferior attributes.

There needs to be some sort of point system for each attractive quality which should be further subdivided into categories. A BBW fan is certain to have a different opinion of what is an attractive breast than a man who likes skinny minnies and likewise with asses.


I submit that the first step in creating a fair and unbiased (hence accurate) rating system is the creation of categories which can be agreed are subjectively attractive. S=skinny B=bbw C=curvy H=hardbody

These should be further subdivided into Y=young M=middlins(30-50) and E=experienced(over 50).


Each body part that is rate-worthy would be represented by the following: Br=Breasts, Lg=legs, As=ass, Lp=lips,E=eyes,F=feet,V=vagina,Gf=general facial appearance,Gb=general body appearance.


i.e. A rating for a 25 year old thin woman with great boobs and nice legs may be tabulated as follows:

Under the Y /S category:

Br=9,Lg=8, As=7, Lp=7, E=6, F=9, V=5, Gf=7, Gb=8

The average rating for this young lady would work out to a respectable 7 and ¾


At the moment this system may still seem clumsy and inaccurate, but at least it’s a start. I appreciate any advice you may have on how to further develop this new rating system.


When objectifying women, we must objectify objectively. Men deserve accurate information. :thumb:

Girl, you have given this waaaay too much thought. ound:

It's all in their head!!! Having to assign a number to something is a lot of work. Sometimes it is easier just to say 10. Especially if you plan to see the lady again!

I go to restaurants all the time why do I give one restaurant 5 stars and the next restaurant 3. Because of the overall experience. Can't wait to hear what the guys have to say about it!!!

 

[Chef99]

ER, many of the gents on this board have wrestled with that very question. In fact, much of the discussion within a specfic review is to clarify that very question. If the rating were to become totally unambiguous, what would be talk about? Your shot at breaking things down into more detail is a good start BUT is still very open for interpreatation. For example, creating sub categories for looks will help a guy if he's a leg or breast man BUT what one person considers a 10 for breasts may still be another man's 4.... and we could have some real fun with the categorizing of age! This is very similar to handicap systems for keel sailboat racing; some systems are performance based others are measurement based. Measurements take the subjective (and political) nature out of the equation but allow little room for individual interpretation and circumstances and thus neither is perfect.

 

[grusse]

the rating is totally subjective,why I don't do the LAS 1-10 thing.

however,your thread is titled "what is a 10?"

based on her photos, Cami Parker!

 

[VanessaofBC]

the rating is totally subjective,why I don't do the LAS 1-10 thing.

however,your thread is titled "what is a 10?"

based on her photos, Cami Parker!

Good one, grusse. That gets the VBC seal of approval. :thumb:

 

[GREYFOXX]

You have to also factor in smile, personality, Sexuality. Not just the persons looks, proportions based on body shape and size.
It is really about how the person makes you feel while you are with them that will determine each persons opinion. And really that is all it ever is an "opinion" . Opinions are like ass holes every one has one.

But you are definitely a 10 to me!:thumb:

 

[badbadboy]

I fail to see the value of a rating system that has no quantifiable measurements by which to determine superior or inferior attributes.

There needs to be some sort of point system for each attractive quality which should be further subdivided into categories. A BBW fan is certain to have a different opinion of what is an attractive breast than a man who likes skinny minnies and likewise with asses.


I submit that the first step in creating a fair and unbiased (hence accurate) rating system is the creation of categories which can be agreed are subjectively attractive. S=skinny B=bbw C=curvy H=hardbody

These should be further subdivided into Y=young M=middlins(30-50) and E=experienced(over 50).


Each body part that is rate-worthy would be represented by the following: Br=Breasts, Lg=legs, As=ass, Lp=lips,E=eyes,F=feet,V=vagina,Gf=general facial appearance,Gb=general body appearance.


i.e. A rating for a 25 year old thin woman with great boobs and nice legs may be tabulated as follows:

Under the Y /S category:

Br=9,Lg=8, As=7, Lp=7, E=6, F=9, V=5, Gf=7, Gb=8

The average rating for this young lady would work out to a respectable 7 and ¾


At the moment this system may still seem clumsy and inaccurate, but at least it’s a start. I appreciate any advice you may have on how to further develop this new rating system.


When objectifying women, we must objectify objectively. Men deserve accurate information. :thumb:

I think you are giving the average pooner too much credit for being able to follow your formula of having NINE different categories :nod: You do realize that most here are not Rocket Scientists, right? ound:

Even having L A S in their review is tough to figure out what they are trying to say. I typically do not do the LAS scale but do a brief summary of their looks, their personality, whether or not it seemed to be a natural experience AND if I had a lot of fun. If I had a lot of fun, the numeric scale is unnecessary because that is all that counts. Once I find SP's who consistently make me feel great, I typically repeat with them.

 

[normisanas]

I fail to see the value of a rating system that has no quantifiable measurements by which to determine superior or inferior attributes.

There needs to be some sort of point system for each attractive quality which should be further subdivided into categories. A BBW fan is certain to have a different opinion of what is an attractive breast than a man who likes skinny minnies and likewise with asses.


I submit that the first step in creating a fair and unbiased (hence accurate) rating system is the creation of categories which can be agreed are subjectively attractive. S=skinny B=bbw C=curvy H=hardbody

These should be further subdivided into Y=young M=middlins(30-50) and E=experienced(over 50).


Each body part that is rate-worthy would be represented by the following: Br=Breasts, Lg=legs, As=ass, Lp=lips,E=eyes,F=feet,V=vagina,Gf=general facial appearance,Gb=general body appearance.


i.e. A rating for a 25 year old thin woman with great boobs and nice legs may be tabulated as follows:

Under the Y /S category:

Br=9,Lg=8, As=7, Lp=7, E=6, F=9, V=5, Gf=7, Gb=8

The average rating for this young lady would work out to a respectable 7 and ¾


At the moment this system may still seem clumsy and inaccurate, but at least it’s a start. I appreciate any advice you may have on how to further develop this new rating system.


When objectifying women, we must objectify objectively. Men deserve accurate information. :thumb:

I definitely appreciate your intent, and my only criticism is that it would be impractical to do given the wide variety of temperaments and intelligence in clients. I believe that for the masses, "Keep It Simple Stupid" is what works because unfortunately we often have to accommodate the lowest common denominator. After all, our society is a democracy, not a meritocracy..... but I digress.

As for your cute, "When objectifying women, we must objectify objectively", I heartily agree. Now women have been objectified sexually since the dawn of time, but men are generally so uncomfortable being the targets of it themselves. We have 2 ways to go - choose the traditional feminist route and objectify nobody, or objectify men too. I prefer the latter for it serves what makes us human. Now I like to put my money where my mouth is, and if I should ever see you and you wanted to write a review and a score, objectify away!

 

[Fullhouse]

Wow, ElenaRoxanne, you put a lot of time, effort and thought into this, and it obviously is something that you would like to standardize or average out.

Well, I think you give the average members on Perb way too much credit. ... It's not that we are dumb, some of us are just not too smart.

There has been an ongoing problem on perb for years, that has had many suggestion to correct it, and it is a very simple problem, nowhere near as complicated as your suggested rating system.

The problem relates to telling the price one paid for the lady, in a review.----- such as $$$20, 3 browns and a green, 2 browns 2 pinks and 2 blues, ...$320, 320$s, 320.00, and on and on.

Most everybody complains about it, most everybody agrees that it should be like any other price quoted in any industry or business. .........$320, or 320.00....................Period ... what's so hard about that ....... but it just doesn't happen.

Elena, For your system, I would think a reviewer would require a fabulous memory with some mathematical skills, additional time to rate 9 criteria's, add them up, divide them and then write them all down. I think some can write their reviews quicker than figuring out those numbers.

Also, averages often skew results. If somebody rated a lady with 7, 8s and 9s across the board except her boobs which he rates a 2, she would still average a high 7...... I, who loves nice boobs, would be very disappointed upon visiting that lady.

Here is another average you can twist and turn.
In B.C., 25% of all accidents are caused by drunk drivers. Which means that 75% are caused by sober drivers. So, if we can get those sober drivers off the roads, accidents should be reduced tremendously.

 

[Jessica James]

Don't get too caught up in what the guys here on perb call a 10 . It's usually something underhanded and untrue just wait until you meet a few of these 10s they talk about and you'll soon realize there is something very very wrong with the rating of looks on perb . just post how gorgeous you are as many times a day as you can and eventually enough guys will believe it and then you'll get a bunch of guys writing reviews how your a 10 that's how it works on oerb . Lolo but then again you might get a bunch of hate mail about how disgusting you are or how so and so is so much better than you and eventually be so terrorized you have to quit the business . That's how 10s can work in the sex trade .
Be happy being a 6 or 7 and call it a work in progress lololol studs who rate are a joke and if you believe the ratings the jokes on you .

 

[HankQuinlan]

Next time, I will book an extra 20 minutes so that I can fill out the spreadsheet. "Could you turn to your left a little bit?" "Hmm...an 8 for that.."

I think that is a doomed project. "Herding cats" would be an apt comparison.

P.S.: I would give you a 10 whatever the "objective" results of my microanalysis.

 

[Ms Erica Phoenix]

Ms Elena:

This difficulty of trying to quantify subjective experience is why I will always prefer qualitative methodologies and reviews! ;D

 

[Ms Erica Phoenix]

I fail to see the value of a rating system that has no quantifiable measurements by which to determine superior or inferior attributes.
(snipped...)

At the moment this system may still seem clumsy and inaccurate, but at least it’s a start. I appreciate any advice you may have on how to further develop this new rating system. When objectifying women, we must objectify objectively. Men deserve accurate information. :thumb:

Ms ER,

Were you being rhetorical or do you want to do the math?

 

[ironguy]

I like the idea because there are so any facets of a woman that are appealing to men......

but.....every man is attracted to whatever he finds appealing, and even this changes from time to time, this makes it difficult to be truly objective....

what makes me happy may not necessarily turn another mans crank,

so I don't know about a complicated numerical formula that gets averaged

perhaps a numerical rating along with a descriptive narrative of each aspect would be of some value

I may not know a lot but what I do know is based on experience,......

and based on my experience.......seeing, touching, tasting, laughing with, and yes even cumming with, you Roxanne, are the benchmark, the standard, the measuring stick of what is a 10 in all the aspects :clap2:

 

[bcneil]

From my understanding of popular culture. A 9 is a lady, in perfect shape, ample breasts and ass without being too big, pretty with perfect skin, beautiful hair, beautiful face.
A 10, is a 9, that does all the extra. Like getting her hair and makeup professionally done all the time, always well dressed in the latest trends, able to intelligently discuss current events, politics, and so forth.

 

[bcneil]

Here's equally interesting question; what makes a 1?

The thing is, nobody really knows what the 1-10 graph even looks like. Is in linear? So each number has 10% of the population?
Is it a bell curve? So 4-7 so like 80% of people fall into those groups. With 1-3 and 8-10 each making up 10%? With 1s and 10s making up a fraction of a percent of people.

But to be a 1, I think you would have to actively try. Sort of like how I think a 10 is a more polished 9. A 1 would be a 2, that actually tries to be less appealing. Maybe a 2 that doesn't shower or brush their teeth.

 

[vancity_cowboy]

well pardners, back in my student days, my scale pretty much went like this...

5/10 was an average looking woman, that i would wander over and say hi to and if she didn't face-palm me, try to hit on

for every point less than 5, i'd divide the number of drinks by 3 that i'd have to consume in order to numb my senses/inhibitions to the point where i'd consider trying to hit on her. so a 4 would need 3 drinks to bolster my courage; whereas, a 1 would need 12 drinks and a zero 15 drinks

for every point above a 5, i'd divide the number of drinks by 3 that i'd have to buy for her and her friends in order to be allowed to mingle and talk to the object of my desires. so a 6 would require buying 3 drinks, a 9 twelve drinks and a 10 fifteen drinks

now remember, this scale was designed by a broke student who was pretty hot. if i was to employ that scale now, i'd likely only have to divide the number of drinks by 1 on the 0 to 4 side; but then i'd have to change the 6 to 10 side to rounds of drinks rather than individual ones!

 

[amigo67]

I measure no one on a number scale.
There is much more to the experience of being with a woman than that. It comes down to how you feel, your subjective tastes, how she feels and how well you connect; that will determine how
you remember an encounter.

 

[Real Sonny Burnett]

well pardners, back in my student days, my scale pretty much went like this...

5/10 was an average looking woman, that i would wander over and say hi to and if she didn't face-palm me, try to hit on

for every point less than 5, i'd divide the number of drinks by 3 that i'd have to consume in order to numb my senses/inhibitions to the point where i'd consider trying to hit on her. so a 4 would need 3 drinks to bolster my courage; whereas, a 1 would need 12 drinks and a zero 15 drinks

for every point above a 5, i'd divide the number of drinks by 3 that i'd have to buy for her and her friends in order to be allowed to mingle and talk to the object of my desires. so a 6 would require buying 3 drinks, a 9 twelve drinks and a 10 fifteen drinks

now remember, this scale was designed by a broke student who was pretty hot. if i was to employ that scale now, i'd likely only have to divide the number of drinks by 1 on the 0 to 4 side; but then i'd have to change the 6 to 10 side to rounds of drinks rather than individual ones!

I think the cowboy is a 10.

 

[Elmore]

The rating system is pretty simple in my mind.
Most people are a 5...average looking.
Saying someone is a 6 or a 7 is apparently an insult ?
An 8 would be exceptional with a 9 and 10 being extremely rare. We all have different preferences and standards as well.
I don't know any escorts in Vancouver who are a 9 or 10.