Adriana✿;1144118 said:This is the stupidest thing I have ever read. You, sir, have not the faintest clue what you are talking about. Men love bush! It's a fact. Just because YOU have an opinion on something, means just YOU have an opinion. (like you would be in a position to know how all men feel) lol
I always have my gorgeous bush on top and like my punani and ass bare underneath, for the most part, but I let it all go every blue moon and love it! I have many regulars who see me because of it.
Like Rodthebod said. Clean is Clean and Dirty is Dirty, regardless if there is hair or not.
Sorry hunny, bush is gross. I'm happy that your clients like yours - you have found a fetish niche and are making money on it. Great stuff - seriously!! But.....you know full well that bald is the expectation these days. If you really think like you do, you may as well stop shaving your legs and armpits, and get a cat! Enjoy!Adriana✿;1144118 said:This is the stupidest thing I have ever read. You, sir, have not the faintest clue what you are talking about. Men love bush! It's a fact. Just because YOU have an opinion on something, means just YOU have an opinion. (like you would be in a position to know how all men feel) lol
I always have my gorgeous bush on top and like my punani and ass bare underneath, for the most part, but I let it all go every blue moon and love it! I have many regulars who see me because of it.
Like Rodthebod said. Clean is Clean and Dirty is Dirty, regardless if there is hair or not.
And there is a tone of male control in some of the 'hair is dirty' comments that is - well - interesting![]()
Read the pro-hair comments. They are just as strident.Vancity - interesting point but the fact that the pro bare comments are littered with 'dirty' tells me that they are not the simple 'I prefer bare' that they pretend to be. Obviously people will have their own preferences and equally obviously SP's will tailor (pun intended) their pubes to suit their market. It is the language of the pro bare that says there is more to it than a simple preference issue. The heat of the language suggests that we are in taboo territory rather than simple preference territory and taboo is about phobia and control. As I said the same arguments and the same or similarly inflamed language is deployed about clitorises in societies where they circumcise women.
Says who? Porn?But.....you know full well that bald is the expectation these days.
Vancity - interesting point but the fact that the pro bare comments are littered with 'dirty' tells me that they are not the simple 'I prefer bare' that they pretend to be. Obviously people will have their own preferences and equally obviously SP's will tailor (pun intended) their pubes to suit their market. It is the language of the pro bare that says there is more to it than a simple preference issue. The heat of the language suggests that we are in taboo territory rather than simple preference territory and taboo is about phobia and control. As I said the same arguments and the same or similarly inflamed language is deployed about clitorises in societies where they circumcise women.
So if i prefer a man without a beard does it mean i'm really into young boys? Sorry but your argument is weak. Hair around the genitals just gets in the way. Trim it. Even today's hippies would grudgingly agree unkempt growth = fail.A man who likes a woman without pubic hair despises adult women so much that he wants us to resemble children.





