Swedish Touch?
- Thread starter orph
- Start date
so highy recommended
And you're going to love the mandatory solo shower.
It wipes about 15 minutes off your 1 hour session.
Where else can you go to spend 100 bucks washing your ass?
And you're going to love the mandatory solo shower.
It wipes about 15 minutes off your 1 hour session.
Where else can you go to spend 100 bucks washing your ass?
Some of you sound very bitter. I really don't get the bitter sniping. If you don't like ST that's fine, but I do. It's cheap compared to where I come from, I think overall the girls are a notch above and I like the atmosphere there. Money isn't an issue to me and I usually get multi-hour sessions and sometimes outcall.
Too bad you've had such bad experiences there, but I always enjoy myself.
Oh and if you're paying 5-600 an hour for anything, you're getting ripped off.
Too bad you've had such bad experiences there, but I always enjoy myself.
Oh and if you're paying 5-600 an hour for anything, you're getting ripped off.
Last edited:
- Hey, it's not bitter sniping, that's your perception.
I think it's called " A Reality Check".
Last edited:
Nah. It's bitter sniping.
I ran a search and looked at a few other threads and the same types of sarcastic, mean spirited posts from people like you pop up again and again. If you prefer lower end SPs that's fine. I'll never criticize you for that. There are times when I've been on a budget myself. Value for $$ is a very relative concept, so I don't see the point in getting angry when people have different perceptions from you on that issue. You might as well criticize me for staying at nice hotels when I travel as well.
Nokia, I appreciate the suggestion and will look into that.
I ran a search and looked at a few other threads and the same types of sarcastic, mean spirited posts from people like you pop up again and again. If you prefer lower end SPs that's fine. I'll never criticize you for that. There are times when I've been on a budget myself. Value for $$ is a very relative concept, so I don't see the point in getting angry when people have different perceptions from you on that issue. You might as well criticize me for staying at nice hotels when I travel as well.
Nokia, I appreciate the suggestion and will look into that.
I disagree. Deany Allen and inthebum's posts are a perfect example of "bitter sniping"
As I just got through saying "value for money" is a very relative concept. It depends on how much each dollar is worth to you, which in turn depends on things like how much money you make, the exchange rate, your standards etc.
When the dollar was strong ST was a downright bargain to me. Now the value for money isn't as good. But it's still very good for me.
As I just got through saying "value for money" is a very relative concept. It depends on how much each dollar is worth to you, which in turn depends on things like how much money you make, the exchange rate, your standards etc.
When the dollar was strong ST was a downright bargain to me. Now the value for money isn't as good. But it's still very good for me.
well i'm just suggesting that these "bitter snipers" are only saying that that there are other places aside from swedish touch that you can get more bang for your buck.
of course they decided to do it in a more sarcastic humorous way which came off as being biter......
but if you haven't been to many MP in vancouver, why don't you take the advice of some other pooners and try a new one? what do you have to lose? besides money of course.....
of course they decided to do it in a more sarcastic humorous way which came off as being biter......
but if you haven't been to many MP in vancouver, why don't you take the advice of some other pooners and try a new one? what do you have to lose? besides money of course.....
ST mostly caters to rich tourists who don't know any better. Try Broadway Body Care. MUCH better value.
Dear Orph,
You're free to spend what you want but I think what the guys are trying to say is it can't be that good for what you're paying at ST. It was only yesterday that reddog, a wise pooner posted the following bit of information in another thread:
Panther
You're free to spend what you want but I think what the guys are trying to say is it can't be that good for what you're paying at ST. It was only yesterday that reddog, a wise pooner posted the following bit of information in another thread:
Another comparable example is buying wine in a restaurant. Let's say you spend $45 on a bottle of Ravenswood Zinfandel. Does the job, not a bad wine, goes OK with food. Next time you spend $80 on a bottle of Frescobaldi and Mondavi Lucente. Even better and a great experience. Then next time you spend $240 on a bottle of Sassicaia. A bit better but not much better that $160 will warrant it. And then you decide you'll go all the way, pull out the Visa Platinum and order a bottle of Chateau Haut Brion 1er Cru 1995 for $1500...a stunning wine but for $1420 more than a wine I was already pleased by? I call that a waste of money. But I think some people fool themselves into perceiving that a wine that expensive tastes better in order to justify how much they are paying for it, else they wouldn't feel good about it.
Panther
Orph, since you are the owner Swedish Touch and your affliation with the Angels is apparent, your comments don't really count from a customer perspective!
You're joking right? I can't tell, but in case you aren't: I visit Vancouver ONCE a year. I'm not even Canadian, have the mod look up my IP.Orph, since you are the owner Swedish Touch and your affliation with the Angels is apparent, your comments don't really count from a customer perspective!
