Carman Fox

Phone, email, send a letter to obama tell him to stop the keystone pipeline

Fudd

Banned
Apr 30, 2004
1,037
0
0
If you value our environment please help and support our opposition to the Keystone Pipeline. Call, write a letter or email to the President tell him to save the Earth.



Thousands rally in D.C. against Keystone Pipeline

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/17/16996283-thousands-rally-in-dc-against-keystone-pipeline?lite



Thousands of protesters took to the National Mall on Sunday for a climate rally that organizers touted as the largest of its kind in U.S. history. The group’s top priority was to urge President Barack Obama to reject the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would carry tar sands from Canada through the United States.


Call the President
Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111

Switchboard: 202-456-1414

TTY/TTD
Comments: 202-456-6213

Visitor's Office: 202-456-2121

Write a letter to the President
Here are a few simple things you can do to make sure your message gets to the White House as quickly as possible.

1. If possible, email us! This is the fastest way to get your message to President Obama.

2. If you write a letter, please consider typing it on an 8 1/2 by 11 inch sheet of paper. If you hand-write your letter, please consider using pen and writing as neatly as possible.

3. Please include your return address on your letter as well as your envelope. If you have an email address, please consider including that as well.

4. And finally, be sure to include the full address of the White House to make sure your message gets to us as quickly and directly as possible:

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Email
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/submit-questions-and-comments
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,655
839
113
Bring on the pipe....................


 

johnniejetpack

come fly with Johnnie....
Feb 6, 2008
1,877
166
63
I use my car for my work every day, and based on the number of cars on the road every day, I would say lots of other people do too. We need affordable gas so we can make a living!!! I am all for the environment, but let's get realistic. Anybody that has an affordable and available alternate energy source please put up your hand!!!!
 

jesuschrist

New member
Aug 26, 2007
1,036
1
0
Thanks for the link, I'll send Obama an email to ignore the protests and go ahead full speed with developing of the pipeline.

Anything the USA can do to have energy independence, the better for world peace. Currently because of the American dependence on foreign oil, many many wars have been fought and many innocent civilians have died.

If you care about the lives of your fellow human beings, if you care about world peace, support this pipeline!
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,655
839
113
 

blueberrymuffin

RETIRED
Jan 22, 2013
71
0
0
Fudd, I'm sorry to break the news to you, but the government is a joke. Our opinion means nothing to them. If it makes them money, they will still do it.

If you want change, we would have to kick out the people in charge by force. I'm afraid there's no other way around it. Our so called "democracy" is an illusion.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
2
18
Why is it that Canada doesn't refine its own oil and export it worldwide rather than allow foreign interests to profit from the value added process. I don't fucking get it.
 

bcneil

I am from BC
Aug 24, 2007
2,095
0
36
Its a done deal at this point Fudd. Regardless if some pooners from Vancouver shoot him an email.

I also don't think its realistic at all, at this point, to expect Alberta to decide to just let the oil sands close.

You are better off owning TRP stock. I have had some since 2005 in my portfolio, added more in 2009 and 2012.
Its an easy stock to own, buy it and forget about it. Then when you are older and no longer want to ride your bike around downtown, you will have funds.
 

jesuschrist

New member
Aug 26, 2007
1,036
1
0
Why is it that Canada doesn't refine its own oil and export it worldwide rather than allow foreign interests to profit from the value added process. I don't fucking get it.
Because our cost of labour is too high for one. Second, we would have to endure that cost of labour to create the refineries, which would be too costly because of that cost of labour. Then, once we have those refineries, our cost of labour would drive up the processing costs.

It's the same answer as to why we really don't do anything with our logs except cut them and ship them somewhere else to make the end product. We don't have much of a manufacturing sector because of our cost of labour. Blame the unions and high taxes!!!!
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
2
18
Because our cost of labour is too high for one. Second, we would have to endure that cost of labour to create the refineries, which would be too costly because of that cost of labour. Then, once we have those refineries, our cost of labour would drive up the processing costs.

It's the same answer as to why we really don't do anything with our logs except cut them and ship them somewhere else to make the end product. We don't have much of a manufacturing sector because of our cost of labour. Blame the unions and high taxes!!!!
Since when is our cost of labour that much higher than the US? I don't buy that argument for one second.
 
Jan 10, 2007
140
2
18
Thank god for the recession in the US.

Keystone will go thru for sure.

Hydraulic factoring will start up in California to tap into additional oil reserves.

The environment bullshit only works in good economic times when people are working and well fed and they have time dabble in such nonsense.

Now that the American people are going to have to decide between real jobs or listen to those idiots geenies.

GUESS WHICH SIDE WILL WIN.

Can't wait to see the drilling start up right in the back yards of all those moronic environmentalists.

Hey Fudd ..... looking goood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Horse99

New member
Aug 17, 2006
555
1
0
Vancouver
Obama is already bought and paid for....so save your emailing the potus.....good way to get on the Secret Service watch list too.
 

dojin

New member
Oct 18, 2009
30
0
0
Because our cost of labour is too high for one. Second, we would have to endure that cost of labour to create the refineries, which would be too costly because of that cost of labour. Then, once we have those refineries, our cost of labour would drive up the processing costs.

It's the same answer as to why we really don't do anything with our logs except cut them and ship them somewhere else to make the end product. We don't have much of a manufacturing sector because of our cost of labour. Blame the unions and high taxes!!!!
I think that is quite disingenuous when salaries (in general) haven't gone anywhere for decades (not even keeping on par with inflation).
It is about profit margins and a race to the bottom.

And as far as taxes, I believe they have been going down over the years except for the general populace where our hidden taxes like user pay fees on services are ramping up like crazy.
 

jesuschrist

New member
Aug 26, 2007
1,036
1
0
I think that is quite disingenuous when salaries (in general) haven't gone anywhere for decades (not even keeping on par with inflation).
It is about profit margins and a race to the bottom.

And as far as taxes, I believe they have been going down over the years except for the general populace where our hidden taxes like user pay fees on services are ramping up like crazy.
Where oh where do you get this idea that union salaries "haven't gone anywhere for decades", nor have kept par with inflation???? No union would tolerate salaries that do not keep up with inflation at some interval!

I don't know what you mean about it being about profit margins and a race to the bottom, but I'll hazard a guess: we can't tolerate the slim margins for us because the rest of the world can produce the products at a lower cost. In other words, we can't compete because our costs are too high - and the principal cost in production is typically labour.

Taxes may have gone down - a bit - but user pay fees and hidden taxes have ramped up, I agree. But it is because of this that labour unions ramp up their demands because they believe their wages should be pegged to inflation. That is in itself the problem: they see inflation, they raise their wages, we get more inflation, and the cycle spirals out of control - until whole industries die off and move offshore, which is precisely what has happened.
 

dojin

New member
Oct 18, 2009
30
0
0
Where oh where do you get this idea that union salaries "haven't gone anywhere for decades", nor have kept par with inflation???? No union would tolerate salaries that do not keep up with inflation at some interval!

I don't know what you mean about it being about profit margins and a race to the bottom, but I'll hazard a guess: we can't tolerate the slim margins for us because the rest of the world can produce the products at a lower cost. In other words, we can't compete because our costs are too high - and the principal cost in production is typically labour.

Taxes may have gone down - a bit - but user pay fees and hidden taxes have ramped up, I agree. But it is because of this that labour unions ramp up their demands because they believe their wages should be pegged to inflation. That is in itself the problem: they see inflation, they raise their wages, we get more inflation, and the cycle spirals out of control - until whole industries die off and move offshore, which is precisely what has happened.
I put in "general" next to the salaries as I am talking about as a whole vs labour just from unions. As far as competition, it is not excusable for manufacturing/lumber/etc companies to be given huge tax credits for machineries and such (not to mention an endless tax deferral) when they are hording away capital gains instead of hiring. As far as union salaries go, they can be from ok to detrimental to the company. The same goes for executive salaries which tie into bogus performance gains that strip away the foundation of a company (i.e. car manufacturers' union employees and executives).

Its a bit of both worlds. Also, I am quite sure (my opinion), even without unions, companies would of shipped the jobs overseas as well. A temporary stock gain for shareholders and a performance increase for the execs. There is no way a worker here can be "competitive" and live in a 1st world country.

Finally reducing taxes for large business (notice i didnt say small business), does jack shit. eg. Carole Taylor's capital gain's tax removal for banks which saved BC bank branches 100 million locally and ironically killed 1600 jobs. And those stupid hidden user pay fees and taxes, that's a huge money grab that seems to go nowhere .
 

dojin

New member
Oct 18, 2009
30
0
0
And to OP:
Not going to bother sending Obama anything. The recent bills he has been signing that strip away freedom like crazy...yea he is just another useless figurehead controlled by industries "too big to fail". That includes most of our govt in Canada too.
 

connor666

Banned
Apr 17, 2008
290
3
0
Fuck stopping the pipeline, get that bitch built ASAP.

Oh shit, gotta cut this post short as my baby seal dinner is getting cold.
 

satinguy

New member
Apr 15, 2011
238
0
0
Edmonton Area
Sorry Fudd,

Won't be happening, like many others i support the pipeline as it is good for Canada and our economy.

I could care less if a bunch of D-list clebrties like Daryl Hannah and Kevin Bacon don't like it.

Billions in Revenue and jobs at stake and it is called the OIL SANDS, only the uneducated Americans or NDP call it tar sands.

This thing will get built regardless of what people here in Canada want or don't want.

If you value our environment please help and support our opposition to the Keystone Pipeline. Call, write a letter or email to the President tell him to save the Earth.
 

ThisEndUp

mort à l'entente
Fudd, I've sent my email to O'bama in support of the pipeline, and also of shore oil exploration

Somehow I find bloody oil much more offensive than what we canadians are producing, or the americans could produce
 
Vancouver Escorts