Hey guys, I'm looking to buy either one and need your opinions on both. FYI, I don't care about the sporty aspect like how fast it can accelerate; mostly city driven. I mostly care about how comfortable a drive is for me and passengers as well as cargo space. Thanks
The Matrix definitely has more room. The 2004 was so nice the front seat flattened out flush with the other rear seats. Rear seat passenger leg room was great, and the seats when put forward was awesome for getting tons of room in the back seat for boning chicks. The drives was clunky, noisy when going over train tracks, I didn't like the clunky jerky transmission shifting. Since I did so much shuttling of junk in the trunk, that car was far more preferable that the Mazda on that point. It's a stubby kind of odd looking design. Totally reliable.
The Mazda is less spacious inside and more 'cramped' feeling, but far less utilitarian/appliance looking. The driving experience was far better, 2.3L, lotsa pep. The newest Mazda's that Modo supplies are nice. Gas mileage is about the same. The air filtering was better in the Matrix than the Mazda... ( its a little thing but I place a high importance on being able to quickly block off outside smells). It has a good solid attractive design that doesn't look outdated as time goes by as compared to the Toyota. I think Mazda has a better design sense.
After driving a Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, I really do appreciate the extra spaciousness and immense gas savings, so I would dump either Toyota or Mazda in a heartbeat for that car if I didn't care about having the hatchback so much. It really is great to be able to quickly jump in the hatchback at a stop light and grab something that would be impossible to do quickly with a non-hatchback.
The RAV4 AWD I liked a lot, sad to see that returned on lease. That still remains my top choice of car style.