I watched part of the video and to me it looks like it would appeal to the tin foil-Art Bell crowd. As for the plane being in small pieces in Penn, it seems to me that it would be closer to a nose down intentional crash compared to a shoot down. The crash debris pattern is similar to the ValuJet crash in Florida a few years ago when the plane went into the ground (swamp) at a high rate of speed and angle of attack and there was almost nothing left except for small pieces. It would stand to reason if the T’s wanted to pitch it nose down then the damage would be the same as in Florida where the plane also went nose first.
As for the buildings, 1 ) why would they need missles? This was a big plane with a lot of fuel on board (about 15 to 20k us gal of fuel) traveling at a high rate of speed. The planes were not flying like you see at the airport for landing but I beleive they were traveling upwards of 300kts. The missles would be like a cherry on a sundae (not the whole meal, you can get by without it) 2) the fuel is the reason the buildings fell. They started the fires that melted/weakened the trusses, which then collaspsed the floors, leading to a chain reaction building failure. How strong should the buildings be anyways? They were designed to be hit by a plane (Boeing 707 I believe) at lower speeds with low fuel tanks. I believe that the senerio was a Boeing 707 lost in fog about to land across the river in New Jersey. I don't believe that this was a conspiracy, since others have mentioned too many mouths would have to be shut in order for it to happen. I do believe that the Bush administration used 911 after the fact to further their agendas (Zionism, oil company profiting). I think that the one fact in my mind is that they never finished the battle in Afghanistan when they could have. Instead they cut and ran and left the symbol of evil alive (bin laden). They then continued to do whatever they wanted by pointing to him when they need a boogie man.
