cumming in her ass...is it really that dangerous

milkchocolate

I luv a hot set of thighs
Mar 31, 2005
168
0
0
Vancouver
Its allways been a huge fantasy of mine to be able to cum in a girls tight ass and pull out after and watch the cum ooze out.

Say for the sake of argument that both individuals were STD free...is it still dangerous ?
 

Verb

Well-known member
Oct 20, 2003
1,300
43
48
SprINGFiELD
milkchocolate said:
Its allways been a huge fantasy of mine to be able to cum in a girls tight ass and pull out after and watch the cum ooze out.

Say for the sake of argument that both individuals were STD free...is it still dangerous ?

At least I don't think she can get preggy takin it in from her poop hole. LoL
 

georgebushmoron

jus call me MR. President
Mar 25, 2003
3,127
2
0
55
Seattle
If both STD free, no danger there. But there is still danger of bad bacteria entering the blood stream of either party, or bad bacteria entering your urinary tract. Bad bacteria in blood stream, if enough of it, could cause you an immunity problem. But to get enough in blood stream you would have to basically feces into an open sore before it could cause you a problem unless your immune system was already hampered. If the bacteria entered your urinary tract, you could get a painful bladder infection. That is unlikely too. I speak from a lot of experience with GFs.
 

Massagegirl

Banned
Mar 25, 2003
891
1
0
I heard that you are supposed to pee after BB anal to prevent feces/bacteria from going up into your urinary tract.
 

georgebushmoron

jus call me MR. President
Mar 25, 2003
3,127
2
0
55
Seattle
Massagegirl said:
I heard that you are supposed to pee after BB anal to prevent feces/bacteria from going up into your urinary tract.
Yes, I think that should help. But in my case, I usually go to the washroom to pee after sex so I would not know if I would have gotten a urinary tract infection had I not peed.
 

FuZzYknUckLeS

Monkey Abuser
May 11, 2005
2,212
0
0
Schmocation
not fucking jokin at all. if both parties are STD free, where is the risk? what harm could possibly come to her from a popper in the pooper?
 

chiefwiggum

Guest
Jun 9, 2004
415
0
0
Calgary
FuZzYknUckLeS said:
not fucking jokin at all. if both parties are STD free, where is the risk? what harm could possibly come to her from a popper in the pooper?
In a monogamous relationship where the two people have been together a long time, and both are holding medical certificates in their hands, and each certificate was dated "today", I can see the risk being significantly lower.

But any woman willing to do this had better be damned sure her partner is clean. Anal sex is still the riskiest sexual activity there is, especially when it's unprotected.
 

nyx

New member
Jun 16, 2005
61
0
0
There's more to it than just STD free

As well as the very real chance of catching something you do not want, this is how it was spelled out to me by a doctor. Sperm has a complex chemical composition. By its design, each sperm is a foreign object that is coated with a protein that supresses the immunological responses of the recipient. Without this property, which apparently is passed onto a fetus, the recipient's body would treat it the sperm as an invasion of foreign objects (which it is) and an immunological reaction would ensue. This suppressive property that each sperm carries ensures that the sperm can make the passage to the egg and, also, that the foetus is not attacked by the mother's body as a foreign object.

The vagina will, by design, drain off excess sperm and channel it, thereby protecting the recipient's body from its presence. The rectum, by design, will not. While the thick walls of the vagina can handle the invasion well, the thin walls of the rectum cannot. Also, because sperm tends to hang about in there, the full effects of the immunological suppression take effect, along with a host of other reactions due to the volatile chemical composition of the sperm.

This in turn, along with the damage done by fucking a hole that was designed for exit only, creates in the recipient a cascading series of reactions on a cellular and hormonal level which can, apparently, cause some serious imbalances in the recipient's body (with repeated exposure, the water balance in the intestinal track gets off kilter resulting in diarrhea for instance).

Also, apparently, the rectum does not register pain and so damage can ensue in the course of the ass fucking, and the recipient would be none the wiser. But that damage can take the form of fissures in the rectum that would then release a bootyful mix of fecal bacteria and sperm into the bloodstream, which would in turn release a freaky assortment of measures in defense of that.

Does it still sound appealing...? Sure looks cool in the moovies ;)
 

mexman

New member
Oct 25, 2004
372
0
0
A birds point of view

That old bird on the sex show on channel 30 something says under no cicumstances should anal sex ever be had without a rubber. She says she would have to run an entire show just to cover the things that could be had by both parties. She says she loves the act ( imagine banging some 70 year old grandma in the wazoo) and stresses never without a rubber. But I do agree, the porn sites love to show the "drip".
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts