2026 USA Political Thread

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,286
269
83
U.S. Air Force Gen. Gregory Guillot inadvertently contributed to the political debate in Canada over the fighter jet procurement when he told a congressional panel earlier this month that fifth-generation fighter jets like the F-35 are “frankly” not needed to defend North America’s borders.

The Norad commander said such advanced stealth fighters are better suited to attacking targets overseas.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/art...g-after-norad-chief-says-theyre-not-critical/

Canada looks forward to Saab Gripen E aircraft interoperability of with our partners.

1000000627.jpg
 

nan

Well-known member
May 1, 2015
251
278
63
Wasn't the Hormuz open just a few months ago?
What happened? View attachment 159186
Art of the deal ... folks forget Trump bankrupted running a casino, a business where the saying goes "the house always wins" and he manages to do the opposite.

At this rate, he'll bankrupt the US financially; morally he's already bankrupt. Take away this sorry excuse of a man his money/fame and leave him with just his character and you can see what kind of a loser Trump is.
 

sexpanther69

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2013
760
900
93
So the maga army decided to do am illegal fly by with a cpl black hawk helicopters at irrelevant kid rocks home

Investigation was launched, but fake strongman Hegseth squashed it and pedo man said they did it for protection 😂😂

You can't even make this style of stupid up

Enjoying ur tax dollars being wasted yet MAGA?
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldshark

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,286
269
83
Libertarian financial blog posts:

The Fourteenth Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” That second phrase, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” is not a throwaway clause. It was deliberately inserted to exclude from automatic citizenship those who owe allegiance to another country.

American citizenship means eliminating Israel dual citizenship.

Patriotism often demands loyalty to borders drawn by chance, yet the earth shares its winds and waters without regard for such lines. To pledge devotion to a fragment of land is to ignore that we are, at our core, inhabitants of a single, fragile home---earth.

Public notice: no gas here...
Fill up your tanks, gas stations are starting to run dry across the nation. Starts with the cheapest stations first going empty and roll over to expensive station's next. Questioned, gas station attendants said people are making runs on pumps panic filling and tankers unable to fill. Thus also means toilet paper 🧻 shortages are next.

Have you seen the yellow bags on the pump or signs in your area? I have American Citizenship means paying taxes to Pedophiles and the Military Israel Complex.

Not so long ago the American colonies overthrew the Entire British Crown over a 7% Tea tax.

Want to starve the parasites to death? Stop paying taxes. After the US Navy admitted to bombing a girl's elementary school it is now legal to stop paying taxes as they have been used for war crimes.

This article is well written and justified.
A Nation is a group of people with a common ancestry. A border defines the area under the jurisdiction of that ancestry.
Do not conflate the two.

10% (at least, the ones that admit it) of sitting congressmen are Israeli citizens; enough to sway the vote on any issue. CIA, Pentagon, State, probably approach 30%+ in senior policymaking positions.

Trump attending Supreme Court arguments in birthright citizenship case

First time ever. A sitting US president attending a Supreme Court hearing. Canadians could agree -- America would be a better ally run exclusively by US citizens.
 

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,334
1,476
113
Guys this richierich97 is clearly a troll/bot - look at his post history. Spouting out US propaganda.
Returning banned members are a normal thing in any regulated website and easy to spot as they post almost exclusively in the threads that got them banned in the first place.

Being denied is their aphrodisiac as well as being hammered with stats and historical facts until frustration sets in and then their feelings get hurt.

Gotta feel for them as it's not easy for their self-esteem on the long run
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,286
269
83
Justices grill Trump administration lawyer on ending birthright citizenship, with president in attendance

The nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute has argued that repealing birthright citizenship would "significantly swell the size" of the population in the U.S. that is considered unauthorized, while leaving an average of about 255,000 children per year born on U.S. soil without citizenship.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-arguments-9.7149797

View as an open borders problem and the birthright argument becomes irrelevant.
 

Larry's Torch

Banned
Apr 26, 2020
594
758
93
"The purpose of birthright citizenship in the U.S. is to guarantee automatic citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction, regardless of their parents' immigration or citizenship status.
This principle, established by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, serves several key purposes:

  • Ensures Equality and Prevents Caste Systems: It prevents the creation of a permanent, non-citizen underclass by ensuring that all children born in the U.S. are full citizens, a direct repudiation of the Dred Scott decision which denied citizenship to African Americans.
  • Promotes National Unity and Integration: It quickly integrates the first generation born in the U.S. into society, fostering a cohesive national identity.
  • Provides a Clear Path to Citizenship: It offers a simple and unambiguous way to prove citizenship—typically with a birth certificate—making the process easy and accessible.
Birthright citizenship in the United Statesperson's acquisition of United States citizenship by virtue of the circumstances of birth
Wikipedia

Founding fathers intent?

The Founding Fathers did not define citizenship in the original Constitution, but they applied the principle of jus soli (right of the soil) from English common law, meaning birth within the nation's territory generally conferred citizenship.
The specific intent behind the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause (1868), crafted by the generation after the Founding Fathers, was primarily to:

  • Overturn the Dred Scott decision and guarantee citizenship to formerly enslaved African Americans and their descendants.
  • Establish a national rule of citizenship that could not be denied by individual states.
  • Include children born in the U.S. to immigrant parents (domiciled aliens), ensuring they were not stateless.
  • Exclude only those with foreign allegiance, such as children of foreign diplomats, invading armies, or, at the time, members of sovereign Native American tribes."
 

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,750
7,403
113
Westwood
Exclude…members of sovereign Native American tribes
Saw a magat politician being asked about Native citizenship. He was unsure whether they are citizens or not. Invalidating their citizenship might be a magat strategy to prevent them from voting.
Trump is already trying to control voters with his new (unconstitutional) law.
 

PuntMeister

Punt-on!
Jul 13, 2003
2,298
1,495
113
DEMOCRAT FRONT RUNNERS for POTUS

Democrats are poised to make some localized gains in Congress and Senate, however the party remains floundering with no clear leader for the 2028 Presidential Elections. More gnashing of teeth and Trump memes will not fix the deep void in democratic party leadership.

From the list of yawners, it will be interesting to see if a real strong electable leader will emerge, or if the party will remain confused and bewildered. Some current front-runners:

1. Newsom - likely a top front-runner for Dem Leader. Shits blue poop, but maybe a bit too left coast to gain traction in swing states?

2. Ocasio-Cortez - most likely to replace Sanders on the far left rant fanatic, but is the USA really ready for a socialist government? Lots of buzz likely before falling short of full support.

3. Harris? - Retread. Lost already. Invisible. Gotta be said—there is a chunk of the USA electorate that have shown they are not quite ready for female president yet. It will likely take a more stable situation to pass that bar. Black too? Obama broke that hurdle but he was a great speaker. Harris is a shitty speaker in comparison to Obama.

4. Whitmer - she will likely make a splash and have influence. Maybe eek one out???, then lose in the big race.

5. Shapiro - strong speaker, perhaps more centralist policies could gain him some traction. Being a jew may work both for and against him. Should we expect more campus Palestinian rallies?

6. Buttigeig - Could make a strong run, especially with younger voters. However, will swing states embrace a gay candidate? Not as media present as he used to be.

7+ Booker, Beshear, Gallego, Moore, etc. - Just not prime-time enough. Cannon fodder for the bigger guns to make it look like a stronger slate than it is.

Outlier: Cuban? Hey, people laughed shen Trump entered politics. And he won. Twice. So maybe Cuban could be the olive-branch centralist with street cred that the nation yearns for.

I’d like to buckle in for a wild ride, except it will likely be more like a senior’s walker race to the finish line. Think I will leave the seat belt off unless something happens to shake up a pretty ho-hum party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nan

dare.devil

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2023
608
790
93
Vancouver
DEMOCRAT FRONT RUNNERS for POTUS

Democrats are poised to make some localized gains in Congress and Senate, however the party remains floundering with no clear leader for the 2028 Presidential Elections. More gnashing of teeth and Trump memes will not fix the deep void in democratic party leadership.

From the list of yawners, it will be interesting to see if a real strong electable leader will emerge, or if the party will remain confused and bewildered. Some current front-runners:

1. Newsom - likely a top front-runner for Dem Leader. Shits blue poop, but maybe a bit too left coast to gain traction in swing states?

2. Ocasio-Cortez - most likely to replace Sanders on the far left rant fanatic, but is the USA really ready for a socialist government? Lots of buzz likely before falling short of full support.

3. Harris? - Retread. Lost already. Invisible. Gotta be said—there is a chunk of the USA electorate that have shown they are not quite ready for female president yet. It will likely take a more stable situation to pass that bar. Black too? Obama broke that hurdle but he was a great speaker. Harris is a shitty speaker in comparison to Obama.

4. Whitmer - she will likely make a splash and have influence. Maybe eek one out???, then lose in the big race.

5. Shapiro - strong speaker, perhaps more centralist policies could gain him some traction. Being a jew may work both for and against him. Should we expect more campus Palestinian rallies?

6. Buttigeig - Could make a strong run, especially with younger voters. However, will swing states embrace a gay candidate? Not as media present as he used to be.

7+ Booker, Beshear, Gallego, Moore, etc. - Just not prime-time enough. Cannon fodder for the bigger guns to make it look like a stronger slate than it is.

Outlier: Cuban? Hey, people laughed shen Trump entered politics. And he won. Twice. So maybe Cuban could be the olive-branch centralist with street cred that the nation yearns for.

I’d like to buckle in for a wild ride, except it will likely be more like a senior’s walker race to the finish line. Think I will leave the seat belt off unless something happens to shake up a pretty ho-hum party.
Sounds like a democrat leadership crisis, with those contenders on the table.
 

dare.devil

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2023
608
790
93
Vancouver
Only someone who has never been in a gym would be impressed by a juicer benching 315.
It seems most of the MAGA's are on juice, angry and unable to take rational decisions.
That press secretary acts like she owns eveybody and treats journaists like shit, infact most of them are like that, they dont have basic human decency.
 

SSL Management

Supporting Member
Aug 19, 2018
312
697
93
DEMOCRAT FRONT RUNNERS for POTUS

Democrats are poised to make some localized gains in Congress and Senate, however the party remains floundering with no clear leader for the 2028 Presidential Elections. More gnashing of teeth and Trump memes will not fix the deep void in democratic party leadership.

From the list of yawners, it will be interesting to see if a real strong electable leader will emerge, or if the party will remain confused and bewildered. Some current front-runners:

1. Newsom - likely a top front-runner for Dem Leader. Shits blue poop, but maybe a bit too left coast to gain traction in swing states?

2. Ocasio-Cortez - most likely to replace Sanders on the far left rant fanatic, but is the USA really ready for a socialist government? Lots of buzz likely before falling short of full support.

3. Harris? - Retread. Lost already. Invisible. Gotta be said—there is a chunk of the USA electorate that have shown they are not quite ready for female president yet. It will likely take a more stable situation to pass that bar. Black too? Obama broke that hurdle but he was a great speaker. Harris is a shitty speaker in comparison to Obama.

4. Whitmer - she will likely make a splash and have influence. Maybe eek one out???, then lose in the big race.

5. Shapiro - strong speaker, perhaps more centralist policies could gain him some traction. Being a jew may work both for and against him. Should we expect more campus Palestinian rallies?

6. Buttigeig - Could make a strong run, especially with younger voters. However, will swing states embrace a gay candidate? Not as media present as he used to be.

7+ Booker, Beshear, Gallego, Moore, etc. - Just not prime-time enough. Cannon fodder for the bigger guns to make it look like a stronger slate than it is.

Outlier: Cuban? Hey, people laughed shen Trump entered politics. And he won. Twice. So maybe Cuban could be the olive-branch centralist with street cred that the nation yearns for.

I’d like to buckle in for a wild ride, except it will likely be more like a senior’s walker race to the finish line. Think I will leave the seat belt off unless something happens to shake up a pretty ho-hum party.
Hillary has actually been mentioned. So don't count her out yet. I don't think she stands any chance but she is in the Fray.

SSL
 

masterpoonhunter

"Marriage should be a renewable contract"
Sep 15, 2019
3,230
5,517
113
The Democrats have an absolute lock on the 'shoot in the foot' proven twice now going against a bonafide moron criminal rapist pedo fuck wad, but I digress, they can lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PuntMeister

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,750
7,403
113
Westwood
Bondi gave Epstein that sweetheart deal way back when.
Maybe some dirt on her is about to surface.
She's got a lot of skeletons in her closet.
 

masterpoonhunter

"Marriage should be a renewable contract"
Sep 15, 2019
3,230
5,517
113
Really hoping someone is writing all this down - really not possible to make it all up and oo eee when the movie comes out it will be a doozy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GeeBeeP
Vancouver Escorts