https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_in_the_United_States
Specifically: "Corporations and unions are barred from donating money directly to candidates or national party committees"
Trump for President. Who's hopping on the bandwagon? Who's digging a bunker?
- Thread starter PuntMeister
- Start date
Specifically: "Corporations and unions are barred from donating money directly to candidates or national party committees"
Wow, does anyone have any idea how truly evil Hillary Clinton is? Long-suffering wife? No-power mad co-conspirator with a rapist. Juanita Broderick is on twitter. Bill violently raped her, Hillary threatened and harassed her. Google "Clinton body count". To name two of very many: Vince Foster-found dead after going to a meeting at the White House-he was signed in, never signed out-his body was found in a park with two bullet holes in his head, an unidentified fingerprint on the gun, and it was ruled a suicide. This year, Seth Conrad Rich, a Democratic employee suspected of being behind the DNC leaks that showed that Hillary's nomination was rigged, leading to the resignation of the Democratic National Committee president during the Democratic convention-shot several times in the back. DC police (who work for the White House) said the motive was robbery. Nothing was taken from him. Clinton is a murderous psychopath who will lead the United States and the world into tyranny unparalelled in history. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbvTor2pdBQ
The 3rd Debate is scheduled for the 19th.
I see all sorts of comments from news sources, blogs etc to cancel Gong Show III.
I gotta agree. There hasn't actually been any debating but more of outbursts, insults and talking over one another. The fact that no Facts have been discussed is part of the problem with the first two debates. Fact checking is available at npr.org but not real time during the debate.
The Moderator is supposed to be Chris Wallace from Fox News which at first glance is wtf why would Hillary even attend? Reading about Wallace though, it seems he has gone after Trump when he has had the chance during interviews.
I see all sorts of comments from news sources, blogs etc to cancel Gong Show III.
I gotta agree. There hasn't actually been any debating but more of outbursts, insults and talking over one another. The fact that no Facts have been discussed is part of the problem with the first two debates. Fact checking is available at npr.org but not real time during the debate.
The Moderator is supposed to be Chris Wallace from Fox News which at first glance is wtf why would Hillary even attend? Reading about Wallace though, it seems he has gone after Trump when he has had the chance during interviews.
Here's a very simple thing I don't understand about Trump's supporters: why do they think he's on their side? He's never given a damn about the "common people" in his life. He's never even pretended to. He's even stiffed his workers and customers out of their due if it suits him. Completely forgetting the crassness, this is their champion?!?
Now the usual retort is that Hillary is no better/is worse, etc. So let's say for argument's sake she doesn't give a damn about the common people either. Let's say they're both crooks. That notwithstanding, he's a business man with no experience in the kind of stuff politicians deal with, whose attitude appears to be "how hard can it be?" or something of that sort. His plans, to the extent they are plans at all, have all the sophistication of an elementary school student's. Of all of us here who have developed skills in our chosen profession, how would we react to some armchair critic with no demonstrable understanding of our day to day coming along and saying "I could do this so much better"? Why trust this guy is any different?
IMHO there is simply no reliable way to judge him the best choice. I understand the frustration a lot of people feel with "the system" but this guy is a blustering bullshit artist (and typical all-promises pre-deal businessman) who will not have the answers. If anything he is of the very self-serving ilk whose corporate greed got the US in the economic situation it's in.
Now the usual retort is that Hillary is no better/is worse, etc. So let's say for argument's sake she doesn't give a damn about the common people either. Let's say they're both crooks. That notwithstanding, he's a business man with no experience in the kind of stuff politicians deal with, whose attitude appears to be "how hard can it be?" or something of that sort. His plans, to the extent they are plans at all, have all the sophistication of an elementary school student's. Of all of us here who have developed skills in our chosen profession, how would we react to some armchair critic with no demonstrable understanding of our day to day coming along and saying "I could do this so much better"? Why trust this guy is any different?
IMHO there is simply no reliable way to judge him the best choice. I understand the frustration a lot of people feel with "the system" but this guy is a blustering bullshit artist (and typical all-promises pre-deal businessman) who will not have the answers. If anything he is of the very self-serving ilk whose corporate greed got the US in the economic situation it's in.
OMG!!!! Baldwin kills it! Haven't seen acting and writing that good in years. ROFLMFAO ???
Hard to take this election seriously but I am wondering if Clinton wins will Bill have to do blow jobs in the oval office.
....why would Bill have to do blow jobs in the oval office....? Was Hillary eating pussy in the oval office while Bill was President....?
Dude, my sentiments exactly. I'm not mad at the writers and actors poking fun at this debauchery of a campaign. I've LMMFAO each time I've watched this sketch.
Hillary's revenge. Google Monica Lewinsky dress stains oval office.....why would Bill have to do blow jobs in the oval office....? Was Hillary eating pussy in the oval office while Bill was President....?
Ya. A better post would have been if Clinton wins as commander and chief will she be able to control Bill's little soldier.
